The dream act failed, but they did repeal DADT. Why won't the Republicans fight harder for what's right?

Have they learned nothing? At least they stopped the dream act...

Anonymous2010-12-19T07:28:27Z

Favorite Answer

This is a terrible law on so many fronts. Political Correctness won this battle. Not
anything but. All those who support this bullshit, are of the age of progressive
indoctrination and awareness over the past 30 years. As a past Combat commander,
and as a Officer who dealt with this issue on a direct basis, The passing of this
law will have a deciding breakdown in the moral of the US fighting force. All of the
swisher sweets who will now preen and prance around Military installations, holding
hands and swapping spit at public events will cause a back lash not ever seen in
the ranks ever before.

There will be riots, not just fights, riots,

Not one Combat unit, will ever accept these people in their ranks, not one. You are
exposing your corpsman to HIV. Just another little matter no one has brought up
or dealt with in this debate or argument.. Get used to the Term FRAG, For this
will start on a basis that will make the frag movement in Viet Nam look like a joke.

This is a dark and very sad day for the Combat men and women of the United States'
Military. It is a win win day for the support personnel who sit on their gay *** and
shuffle paper. Sad sorry phucking estate of affairs.

?2016-10-06T10:25:48Z

previous human beings are uncomfortable with homosexuality. it somewhat is a cultural factor. no longer all republicans oppose changing the coverage. even though it is not precisely common. Fraternization and sexual harassment regulations will could desire to be as much as date to account for comparable gender relationships. If a at as quickly as guy walked right into a women human beings's bathe he'd be court docket-martialed. What happens while gay adult adult males are spying on different adult adult males contained in the bathe? Is it diverse? what's going to the protection stress coverage on gay marriage be? Married provider individuals get larger pay than single ones. How do you handle fraudulent marriages of pals that in basic terms want extra money? i'm no longer saying issues shouldn't replace. i'm in basic terms saying that this could complicate countless issues.

George Washington2010-12-18T21:23:19Z

S ---w you,the Dream act was a nightmare for LEGAL TAX PAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS.But I'm also against HOMOSEXUALS in any form,military or otherwise.I still think we should enforce the sodomy laws and any other that apply to the unnatural acts of these P P P P L E.!Also marriage is between Adam and Eve,not Adam and Steve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

Anonymous2010-12-18T19:38:47Z

Well I guess it is time to pull the troops from Afghanistan, no way we are gonna win with openly gay soldiers. And might as well just cut the Pentagon's budget in half and concentrate on Isolationism because the USA will never win another war with pansy's on the front lines.

We are doomed...we are allllllllll doomed!!!

And shouldn't it be....why won't the Republicans fight harder to protect the right to discriminate against people Jesus would like to strangle to death?

?2010-12-18T18:21:32Z

RINO's are a part of the problem. Like you said, at least the Dream Act has been crushed.

Show more answers (16)