Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Do you think adding DADT and DREAM Act is sneaky?
Sen. Harry Reid has added repeal of the controversial DADT (Don't Ask, Don't Tell) policy and the enacting of the DREAM Act (whereby children of illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to earn U.S. citizenship by either attending college or joining the military). Additionally, there is rumor that Sen. Reid wants to add a policy allowing abortions to occur in military hospitals so long as federal funds are not used to pay for them (currently women are referred to off-base facilities for this procedure).
The Defense Appropriations Bill is supposed to decide how much money the Department of Defense gets each fiscal year to build on-base housing, finance these wars, pay the servicemembers, and handle our health care.
By adding all the extra controversy, where does that leave us military folks? Will our elected officials fail to vote on this because of the debate? Is it a sneaky plan to shake up mid-term elections rather than focus on taking care of our servicemembers?
Your thoughts, please.
My concern is not so much with the details of what has been attached to the bill. I'm more bothered by the fact that, because these things are controversial, the DoD might not get the funding required because people will be arguing about DADT, DREAM Act, and abortion in DoD hospitals.
10 Answers
- IsabellaLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
That's why I hate when they "mix and match" stuff in bills. I learned a long time ago that you have to read the whole thing top to bottom because they often sneak one little provision, possibly one liner, that is totally unrelated and unacceptable.
I am also concerned that our troops will suffer. There is a process to go with both of these measures, and apart from the Hispanic population, Dream Act is not that popular. It will open floodgate of illegals here and our tax coffers will be empty in no time. Also for DADT there are implications for the military and they should decide, not some ignorant career politician that is totally detached from reality.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
This very discussion is on Fox News right now. Rich Lowery from National Review and Alexander Lyons from Democratic Gain are bantering back and forth. Rich is completely against the legislation and Alexander is all for it.
Anyway, Harry Reid is toast and he knows it. His so-called Dream Act cannot stand on its own so he needs to attach it to the defense bill. Who is against defending the country? No one and it wouldn't matter anyway because the Constitution mandates it.
- ?Lv 45 years ago
He nevertheless has the "Dream Act" to fall back on... he basically won't have the capacity to assume the gay hispanic vote! bill Clinton did no longer pass a regulation, bill, or act to enforce DADT; in the event that they have been fairly extreme approximately recalling the DADT, all it demands is the Grand Poobah of Lies to do it with the help of government Order! yet what are you able to assume from a celebration that calls preserving the present tax ranges a "tax minimize" or how "slicing taxes" potential we could desire to "minimize verteran advantages, social protection, and medicare to the elderly" (Obama at His "city corridor" the day basically before this... would not all and sundry watch and hear?) while fairly there are different "aspects" they could. How approximately basically stop "making new agencies" like Obamacare, economic, etc? See something below that desires DOWNSIZED or perhaps MOVED TO STATE-point JURISDICTION? yet then, that could be to accept as true with SHARRON perspective and each TEA celebration candidate that government HAS GOTTEN TOO great and that we could desire to continuously shrink ITS length!
- 1 decade ago
the reason it was attached to DADT is based on the dream act, illegals will need to go to college or serve the army to become legal..its not poof, everyone is legal now.
and if u think about it for a second, which route are they more likely to take? of course the military one.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Harry Reid is vile and horrible. If he wins re-election, I will lose all hope for the country, and all faith in the voters of Nevada.
- 1 decade ago
Everything Reid does is sneaky and now that he is in trouble in Nevada, he is going to do whatever he can to get re-elected.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I knew many very good sailors during my career that were gay. I support fully equality for them. Dream act OTOH is rewarding those who broke our laws. I have to say hang Reid and all illegals and their demon spawn. Thank you and good night.
Source(s): For the idiots, no I do not watch Fox news, listen to Rush or belong in the tea party. I am conservative but vote both parties depending on the person running. - ?Lv 71 decade ago
Of course it is sneaky. Reid is a Democrat after all..
Democrats will blame Republicans for it not passing in a timely manner and accuse them of leaving our brave men and women defenseless. Their lemmings will eat it up too..