How many deniers does it take to produce GW/CC 'proof', logic and evidence?
I haven't seen a piece of logic in here posted by a GW/CC denier backed up by actual evidence and only the gibberish that they want us all to believe, cause they wrote it, so it must be true.
Its also easy to verify that the links and blogs they produce are clearly manufactured and paid for. I have personally seen an image from a NASA site that showed the substantial warming in the Arctic stolen and the red replaced with blue to attempt to show there was global cooling. Clearly oil companies like BP and Exxon that can afford to lose billions and still thrive and buy out politicians and scientists have much more to do with the denieir websites and attempts to attack science. BP can loose 42+ billion and destroy the Gulf environment and still thrive.
For those who continue their desperation, sorry Climategate was proven to be just another on of your attacks. All scientists were completely cleared in 5 independent investigation. That was 6 months ago.
I won't comment during the interim cause I have no desire to waste my time on denier logic. I just want to see the 'rock solid' proof, evidence and logic that the frauds and real hoaxters put out.
Well so far 2 attempts by deniers. One was a Fox News video trying to make a mountain out of a frivolous law suit.
The other statement, just words with the typical, 'I said it so it must be so' with nothing to back them up.
Hey Dook: I agree that they throw out gibberish to confuse the issue and everybody. I just haven't seen any logic out of them to disprove GW. The number of paid deniers the oil and coal companies put into their agenda must be staggering but they have failed and continue to fail miserably. Yes Yahoo Answers is a joke, just trying to get my say in before I get too tired of this incessant crap from the denialists. The truth is the denialists can only deny the truth for so long before even they will beging to realize how stupid they were.
Well so far 2 attempts by deniers. One was a Fox News video trying to make a mountain out of a frivolous law suit.
The other statement, just words with the typical, 'I said it so it must be so' with nothing to back them up.
Hey Dook: I agree that they throw out gibberish to confuse the issue and everybody. I just haven't seen any logic out of them to disprove GW. The number of paid deniers the oil and coal companies put into their agenda must be staggering but they have failed and continue to fail miserably. Yes Yahoo Answers is a joke, just trying to get my say in before I get too tired of this incessant crap from the denialists. The truth is the denialists can only deny the truth for so long before even they will beging to realize how stupid they were.
I suspect the number of deniers it will take to disprove AGW is infinite and they'll never reach that number no matter how hard they try. First of all it takes logical ability, and I see very little of that from the deniers.
Oops sorry for the double post, my internet connection did a hiccup and no way to fix it.
@Dent Your studies from 1997 and 2000 are just proof of how desperate you are. As I proved you wrong the last time I delt with you. You didn't explain what I asked you last time so you are irrelevant and full of it. What happened prior to the industrial revolution to cause the major upswing? Even this time I asked for logic and proof and you give me a couple of words and links to some guys college research in 1997. Where is your logical ability to actually analyze your links?
@Dent Smarty comments huh, 1997 conclusions are irrelevant as they did not have actual data they have now. 200 years ago data is irrelevant for the same reason.
The fact is that we live here and now and what we have to deal with is whats happening now. Go ahead and live in the past, the rest of the world will go on and continue living in the present without you. I see you keep avoiding the issue. Until you can find an alternative valid explanation to why all this happened at a unprecedented rate just after the industrial revolution, you are full of it!
@Jeff M, good job! Catching all the misinformation spread by these guys is a daunting task and gets so tiring after a while.
@Rio Well your article shows the reality that 97% of scientists are on the correct side of the issue. What the ruckus is about is the misinformation in here. If people are going to claim global warming is not happening or its not man made then they had better come up with an explanation of why it happened right after the industrial revolution and why we have raised the temperatures at a faster rate than nature normally can. Something had to cause our last 13 years to be warmest in the last 200.
Blaming it on nature or the Sun is crap. To back oil and coal monopolies over the health of the only world we'll ever know is absolutely wrong and that is what the ruckus is about. Its time to stop the rif raf from taking over this joint.
@Martin Yeah the burden of proof is on the us to set of the alarm to wake up the sleepwalking brain dead, who made up that rule? The sleep walking brain dead? By the way I have already proven it, I only asked you all to disprove me and you haven't! Since none of you can come up with an alternate explanation I have no alternative but to pronounce you deniers failures.
Claiming natural cycles is the last refuge of the desperate and ignorant. It shows you believe that black magic causes Earths cycles. Well I have news for you black magic didn't cause the last 200 years!