Lots of accusations, but to date, no credible evidence seems to be available?
This question has nothing, at all, to do with his subsequent work with his foundation for cancer research. The bottom line, is just like in baseball, if you have to 'cheat' to perform at a higher level it reduces their winning or success significantly. BTW, just because he was able to avoid detection does Not mean he was clean!
Mtrlpqbiker
Favorite Answer
Other athletes have been convicted of drug use without ever having tested positive. The lack of a positive test will not prevent him being found guilty if enough of his ex teammates testify against him. When people are saying this in front of a grand jury where they can be prosecuted for perjury if they should lie under oath, things are somewhat beyond accusations
bob
Give the guy a break he had cancer for god's sakes. If he did use that drug it's only fair because everyone else didn't have cancer bogging them down. BTW I am not a Lance Armstrong lover. I think he's a d-bag for leaving his wife.
Vinegar Taster
After 10 years, I don't think so. And if he is clean, then there's nothing to prove.
If "everyone " was cheating, then everyone had an equal chance to win. He still won.
?
Don't know. Don't care.