Why is idealism condemned?
Idealism is condemned vehemently with a cynically negative perspective. If idealism is simply an idea then an ideal, then an idealism and then an ideology, then is not the condemnation of idealism, simply an idea, then an ideal, and then an idealism, then an ideology? Isnt this attitude the very definition of cynicism? (Isn't this mass cynicism the same attitude for a murder conspiracy)? jeeezus?
To the first respondent. I dont know how to make that symbol. Thanx for training yourself in the ability to read. And thanx for the compliment on my writing ability.
Xaxorm
You had a shift in perspective halfway through. You had a second thought didn't you? Thanx for chaniging from cynical mass joiner perspective, optimistic, individual stand upon your own person. That was the purpose of my post, and you have proven me admirabley. the question next is, which will the next respondent join. It will be either of four, the same as the first respondent,(a firm positive), the same as you, the second respondent( a change from negative to positive). A firm negative, or a changeup from positive to negative. Watch this question and see.
And there we have the third response. a firm negative from David (hegel"s translator). Who is hegel? I dont see him posting anything? Are you not simply promoting negativism as a negative,IDEA, by believing you have an ideal, and spouting an idealism, in support if your own philisophic ideology? isn't that another concept condemend by the same philosophy? (narcissism) How can you be negative, toward humanity, be narcissistic, and still live with yourself as an OXYMORON? (What does hegel have to do with personal philosophies, and whom said you could speak in his stead., and why does his personal philosophy give rise to your personal negativism, , and what ideiology are you practicing, which will allow you to negate your own narcissism? I never ask a fifth question for that is where the answer lives.
As prophesied the fourth respondent was a shift from a positive beginning, to a negative finish. I assure you all, every respondent from this time fourth w ill join one of you four in their perspective. Watch this interesting question and see my prophecy unfold in effect.
I am good, are you god? You were talking to yourself. These additional details, "if you could acrtually read" are reactions to my responders. The pattern found here first appeared in the responses from my readers. And as predicted, you have enacted the category (2) response. A negative beginning ending with a shift in the middle to the opposing perspective. You end with a compliment and a prescription based which was already performed, and ignored by your consciousness. but not your subconscious. My perception of my readers iss idealistic. Thanx for the compliment. And this was a well thoughtout question. I thought about it for 60 years before i posted it. My advice to you is (LEARN TO READ), and then your intelligence can get through instead of your predetermined (prejudiced), attitude.
Now for the simplifications. The first foru responses set the tone for all responses, and it is prophesied by me, that all respondents willfit into one of the first four categories. labelling them as 1234...
Tht first four are 1234...
#5 was a 2
#6was a 4
I will post this description as the responses come in.
#7 is a 1
Note, when these responses are made to the end of the responses. all the same numbers think alike. The ones are ones, the twos are twos the threes are threes, the fours are fours.
#8 is a 4
As this can go on forever, in the typical form of trampling out the victory, i am going to put a stop to this question, by picking the onemand only correct answer. the correct response is responder #1. A clean positive with a condemnation of cynicism. His further, reference was in the link, and should be read if you want to get an idea of the lcynical persecution of idealism.