Do You Agree With Me?

(I'm just posting this twice to get more opinions)

The thing that annoys me about SOME Ron Paul supporters..

I think he is a good man and has some good ideas but his foreign policy is terrible.

Why do they keep supporting a person that will not win? The goal is to regain the country. Why not support a candidate that will win? I just think Republicans should worry about just getting a Republican or Conservative in the White House, then start being picky. Ive heard some say they wont vote for anybody other than Paul when a candidate goes against Obama. That in my mind is basically supporting Obama's presidency. We need to worry about getting a Conservative or Republican in the white house not just getting Ron Paul there. Besides, he cant debate like Obama. Obama has a natural gift for debating, Ron Paul just isn't as smooth and persuasive. Do you agree with Me? If not please state your reasons. I am open to anyones opinion. I love good debates.

My Source- my 14 year old mind.
God bless

2012-02-13T12:39:14Z

Yep. It is pretty damn obvious. Something upset little Ms. Communist? I hope you arent offended by my age. OH DEAR!

2012-02-13T12:43:14Z

Thank you Daisy. I re read what I said and I DID make a mistake. Assuming a common goal was probably not the wisest thing to say. Thank you for being quick to point out my mistake.

2012-02-13T12:46:15Z

Yes I do understand Foreign Policy. More than most adults.

2012-02-13T12:48:43Z

Yep. I guess I am an idiot, I actually understand grammar enough to converse with people. I'm such an idiot!

2012-02-13T12:52:41Z

Thank you Jim. They refuse to do what will get a Rep. or Conservative in the White House. Most of the Libertarians that I have encountered say that they would rather have Obama as President than another Candidate besides "Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul".

2012-02-13T12:54:21Z

Well.. Thank you for your input everybody. Even you Liberals and Paul supporters.
God bless.

Anonymous2012-02-13T12:32:50Z

Favorite Answer

"My Source- my 14 year old mind"

Well that's pretty damn obvious.

Otto Maddox2012-02-13T12:40:38Z

If you think the Republicans will do any better than the Democrats you're not paying attention.

George Bush was President less than 4 years ago. Funny how Republicans don't even mention his name when they are campaigning. It's like that guy was never in office. They go all the way back to Ronald Regan, still.

Obama doesn't have a natural gift for debating. He's got great speech writers, great P.R. people, and can read very well off of a tele prompter. Candidates don't have real debates anymore. There is way too much to lose. It's all scripted and choreographed by both sides before anything is ever shown to the people.

I will vote for anyone but Barrack Obama. I do wish Ron Paul stood a chance of getting the nomination. I'll admit he's not going to be the candidate. I think our current Foreign Policy of policing the entire world, of protecting other countries who don't pay a penny for our services, is really stupid.

?2012-02-13T12:40:02Z

I disagree.
First, I'm flipped on Paul. I support his foreign policy 100%, and hate pretty much everything else (probably why I'm left and you seem to be conservative).
Second, always support the candidate you like best. Although the winner-takes-all american system makes that a stupid thing to do. Luckly I don't live there.
Thirt, Obama will crush pretty much any opponent. He's a good debater and has his economic results on his side. He also got the office, thus didn't face the dirt-throwing of the primairies. Elections for oval office are always staked in favor of the president.
Fourth, is there a right-wing alternative for Ron Paul? He's a good deal different than Romney, Santorum or Gringich (or however you spell his name).

Barry2012-02-13T12:42:21Z

Good for you to be so involved at 14. Don't listen to the naysayers, this is a good question. I happen to agree with those who stick with their candidate despite the fact they probably won't win. Support of a candidate represents more than just getting someone into office. It makes a statement as to where you stand as a voter, what you believe in, and what you will support in future elections. You're candidate may not win this election, but maybe more people will join you in your views over time, thanks to the attention your support for a candidate has brought to that candidate's views. This is how movements are started. It takes time and patience but eventually sticking to your guns can really make a difference.

rieves2016-12-08T22:16:16Z

a million) Indo-pak are nevertheless the biggest contention in cricket - Agreed Dwayne Bravo is the wonderful 'clever' All rounder than others (modern gamers) - Agreed 3) Mohammad Amir is a greater effective Bowler Than Wayne Parnell - Dis-Agreed 4) South africa is a properly balanced element than different communities - Dis-Agreed 5) AB de Villiers is the main stylish participant than different gamers - Dis-Agreed 6) Brett Lee can not greater be a 'valuable Bowler' as his age is catching up with him - Dis-Agreed 7) Lasith Malinga Has the wonderful hairstyle - Dis-Agreed 8) Daniel Vettori is the wonderful sluggish left-arm orthodox spin in terms of flight and guile somewhat than huge turner or pinpoint accuracy - Agreed 9) Cricket area is getting greater effective and greater effective - Agreed 10) Cricket is an rather good entertainment than movies - Agreed

Show more answers (11)