If temperatures continue to rise, will you still be in denial of manmade global warming?
Obviously a question for those who don't accept that we are significantly warming the planet.
Lets be a little more precise; if at the end of this decade, we have seen as much warming over the previous one as we had seen when comparing the 2000's with the 1990's, or the 1990's with the 1980's ...
Would this be enough to get you to change your view?
Assuming no surprises; natural factors remain normal and that we continue with 'business as usual' regarding our CO2 emissions.
2013-05-11T17:45:53Z
Yes kano; subject to my condition of normality continuing, if I understand AGW correctly, then temperatures HAVE to rise. If they don't, then I will have to change my view.
Kano2013-05-11T16:37:19Z
Favorite Answer
If temperatures rise in a reasonable response to Co2 levels I would have to reconsider my opinion. what about you, if temperatures stop rising and start to fall will you change your opinion?
i think of you have the needed information in front of you to answer the question. on the only hand you have your professor and a scientific e book – the two are professional components and the two are waiting to offer you the information and figures to returned up the claims. on the different hand you have the be attentive to reporters who're no longer professional scientists and who might want for example impartiality via featuring the two sides of the argument. in the one hundred eighty years in the previous worldwide warming grew to become a political concern there wasn’t a single paper printed that doubted that mankind grew to become into influencing the climate (worldwide warming has been a scientific concern because of the fact that 1811). as quickly because it grew to become politicised and the huge oil and potential companies have been given in contact the skepticism began. You’ll locate that virtually continually any ‘scientific’ learn that refutes worldwide warming could be traced as we talk returned to the oil companies. this is a few thing we’ve considered time and time returned in the media and on solutions. on the tip of the day, worldwide warming is ruled via quantum mechanics (how issues behave on the atomic point). this is the main effective of all scientific regulations and is a few thing we can’t replace in any way. like it or no longer, worldwide warming is an inevitability. playstation – Don’t abandon your learn subject count number, to confirm it’s precise please acquire your information from credible scientific sites.
This is based on the following: Temperature in 1850, when everyone in this forum without exception admits we didn't know the temperature then Temperatures being taken globally, when again everyone admits they haven't been ,not even now. .75 of one degree in 163 years? Assuming this is even true how big a deal is that? Where are the climate refugees? Where are the disappearing islands? Where is the coral dying off if left alone by Man, certainly not in any protected zone.
Yes, let's be precise, tell me what the temperature rise was on Thatcher Rock Torbay England between 1954 and 1987. Or Thohoyandou, South Africa. Or Martha's Beach, Falkland Islands. "Let's be precise". What's a "Natural Factor"?
Ha ha nice try but it's not the real world climate realists who say we aren't significantly warming, it's the pro warming official temperature measuring organisations around the world such as the UK met office who have had to grudgingly admit we aren't warming. And lets not forget the main University which collects this data, East Anglia Uni also having to admit no warming. I'm sorry but I can't just pretend it's warming when it's not to suit your political crusade against carbon, which I must say is a pretty weird thing for a carbon based life form to do.
Notice, there is no sleight of hand, the chart is using raw data and I stayed far away from 1998, which you greenies blame El Nino for messing up the stats.