So liberals can believe a terrorist, but not the men that tell us the guy they traded 5 taliban for is a deserter?
What makes you think that this terrorist is telling the truth?
What makes you think that this terrorist is telling the truth?
McNamara
Favorite Answer
Liberals believe this terrorist who lied literally a matter of hours ago, but not the military and State Department personnel who were in Libya during the Benghazi attack. They call Bergdahl's platoon teammates and leaders liars while defending an openly anti-American deserter. They're fine with negotiating with terrorists but refuse to negotiate with Republicans.
Does anyone else see a pattern here?
ms manners
I'm pretty sure none of them have talked to the "terrorist".
The same guy who previously denied being involved in the attack on the consulate.
So they aren't even believing him, they are believing the administration's story about him.
Just like they bought the administration's story about Bergdahl.
?
The personal testimony of a man's own actions as opposed to the testimony of character witnesses not eye witnesses. I can't be sure that he is telling the truth, but it doesn't seem like something for which he has any incentive to lie.
xpatinasia
Reagan negotiated with terrorists, exchanging guns for hostages, and then the guns were used against American soldiers. Bush43 released 500 Gitmo detainees without receiving anything in return. Conservatives loved it. Obama released 5 Gitmo detainees, and received an American soldier in return. Conservatives hated it.
Captain Obvious, Defender of Snack Pudding
I guess that means the "terrorist" did not name Barry as his accomplice, or cons would believe every word he uttered.