So liberals can believe a terrorist, but not the men that tell us the guy they traded 5 taliban for is a deserter?

Liberals believe this terrorist who lied literally a matter of hours ago, but not the military and State Department personnel who were in Libya during the Benghazi attack. They call Bergdahl's platoon teammates and leaders liars while defending an openly anti-American deserter. They're fine with negotiating with terrorists but refuse to negotiate with Republicans.

Does anyone else see a pattern here?

I'm pretty sure none of them have talked to the "terrorist".

The same guy who previously denied being involved in the attack on the consulate.

So they aren't even believing him, they are believing the administration's story about him.

Just like they bought the administration's story about Bergdahl.

The personal testimony of a man's own actions as opposed to the testimony of character witnesses not eye witnesses. I can't be sure that he is telling the truth, but it doesn't seem like something for which he has any incentive to lie.

Reagan negotiated with terrorists, exchanging guns for hostages, and then the guns were used against American soldiers. Bush43 released 500 Gitmo detainees without receiving anything in return. Conservatives loved it. Obama released 5 Gitmo detainees, and received an American soldier in return. Conservatives hated it.

I guess that means the "terrorist" did not name Barry as his accomplice, or cons would believe every word he uttered.

They'd believe the Devil himself if he sang a song to their liking.

The video nonsense provides him with the only excuse available, and when that excuse is one that Obama wants to hear, what else is he going to say?.

why can't i believe a terrorist...i thought torture worked...

The terrorists said the same thing before the attack so I don't see the point of doubting him.

Republicans seem pretty sure he is responsible as well, or is all that bipartisany cheer really a hoax as I privately suspect?

Liberals don't actually believe him, but you've gotta understand. In this situation, the deserter represents obama, and the deserter's squad represents Conservatives.

It doesn't matter if the deserter is lying through his teeth, liberals would have chosen to believe him over his squad because he represents obama.