The necessity of freedom of speech, the desire to protect all forms of speech, and to rebuke those who try to deplatform other people...?

Originally, these were the core concepts of what the Liberal ideological stood for, I mean it is in the name, Liberal for Liberty, basically the freedom from any and all restrictions... WTF happened to that?

tigeress2018-03-06T22:37:12Z

Liberals do protect the Freedom of Speech as well as the freedom to express yourself as an artist or an author. However, there are words that are not protected by the First Amendment and the law defines them as "fighting words".

Fighting words legal definition is " those words that their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace or promoted violent acts that lead to the risk of life or limb". In tort law, one who uses fighting words toward another creating anxiety or apprehension on that person can be charged with assault.

Anonymous2018-03-06T22:20:55Z

Yes everyone has a right to free speech. And free speech gives the right to protest what is being said. So it goes both ways.

Anonymous2018-03-06T22:17:06Z

No, liberalism has always been about allowing free speech. It never meant social acceptance of all speech. Our founding fathers werent that nice to royalists if you want an example.

Anonymous2018-03-06T22:09:38Z

Don’t worry about it. It’s not like republicans represent those Americans anyway.

Anonymous2018-03-06T22:09:22Z

I deny you a platform. There! Wah hah!

Show more answers (1)