Believing in something without evidence allow wars to be waged. What do you think?

User2019-07-14T15:00:00Z

Also:
- not believing in something without evidence allows wars to be waged
- believing in something with evidence allows wars to be waged
- not believing in something with evidence allows wars to be waged

So:
believing or not believing
with or without evidence
allows wars to be waged

because

these factors are not relevant to what allows wars to be waged.


Similarly: writing with your left hand allows wars to be waged.

Christian Sinner2019-07-14T03:08:58Z

Typically there is plenty of fighting over things known. It sounds like you are looking for a confirmation bias.

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.[1] It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for desired outcomes, emotionally charged issues, and for deeply entrenched-beliefs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

Carmen2019-07-14T03:05:45Z

No. Most wars are waged over resources, others over human rights. Some may use a peoples belief in order to rally the morality of the troops, but even the Holy Crusades were not really being fought because of religious belief.

spongy2019-07-14T02:54:25Z

No. Thats ridiculous.
Thats like a.. tantrum of a 3 year old when he doesn't understand. The world now days gets so offended- grow up humanity its about time- like get over it -people are diffrent.

Jessica2019-07-14T02:50:49Z

I think you may have omitted part of your question.

Show more answers (5)