What was the point in having 3 lawyers testify when they aren't fact witnesses ?

Question

Next time try to find lawyers who are least likeable! One lawyer was a pretentious pseudo intellectual , the female lawyer has a vile personality, and the other one was completely forgettable.  The only lawyer that sounded intelligent and reasonable was the one who opposes the impeachment. Also what the hell is the purpose of this fake impeachment inquiry? Let me end the suspense and fast forward.  The "house" will commit political suicide and vote to impeach. When it goes to the senate it will die thus exonerating Trump and assuredly giving Trump four more years..  How does it feel to know you are participating in an exercise in futility ?

Alexander · Answer

They are EXPERT witnesses, not MATERIAL witnesses.

Anonymous · Answer

You are likely correct. There is a slim chance that the Democrats will have enough sense to vote for censure, but given the psychosis cause by TDS of the left, that is not looking terribly likely.

The most annoying thing to me, is the utter absurdity of this.  One of the articles of impeachment is obstruction of justice in Trump not giving documents to Congress.

To make how absurd this is VERY clear, this is still in the courts as to whether Trump can exercise executive privilege.

If SCOTUS says he can not, and he then gives Congress the documents, he has not done anything wrong. If the court says he can, he has not done anything wrong.

The House is literally saying that SCOTUS does not have the authority to make the determination.

THAT is more unconstitutional than anything they claim Trump has done. That is a literal slap in the face to separation of powers. That is Congress trying to say that Congress rules all.

What was the point in having 3 lawyers testify when they aren't fact witnesses ?

Trending Questions