Herd Immunity was the de facto 45 Admin Covid policy. Was a collateral benefit (or even a goal) to kill off unproductive sick/old people?
It certainly appeared that producing death was just collateral damage to Herd Immunity to preserve the fabled economy that would get him reelected.
There were even those who said publicly that losing some people was no big loss (TX Lt Gov Dan Patrick said "As a senior citizen, are you willing to take a chance on your survival" to save the economy? "I’m all in" he said).
So who cares if a bunch of old geezers (mostly in Blue cities & states who wouldn't vote Republican anyway)?
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/03/dan-patrick-coronavirus-grandparents
Perfect: Of course - egregious oversight on my part
u_bin: Mistakes were made before Covid was as well understood as it is now. Cuomo has admitted as much.
BIG DIFFERENCE: Trump never admits anything.
OTHER BIG DIFFERENCE: Death was NOT the GOAL of ACA. But it sure looks like a goal of Trump!
u_bin: Not arguing any of what you say. But NONE of that what-aboutism addresses the question posed. Total fail, as always with you.