Based off Fox News legal arguments in court why would any politician ever take them seriously?
Fox News was successful in court with their legal argument that no sane person would take Fox News as factual. This argument save the Fox News millions of dollars in defamation lawsuits and other scandals due to misinformation. Based off of these legal arguments that Fox News has why would anyone ever take them seriously? Why would Any politician take a question from Fox News based off of their legal argument? So logically speaking Fox News can I have their cake and eat it too. If they want to stay their factual then they have the retroactively pay any damages cost from misinformation and defamation and character that they were sued for. If Fox News is by their own definition fake news and no same person would take them as factual and why would any politician actually waste their time and take a question from Fox News
Fox News is the only news source that I can think of that literally went to court and argued that no sane person should take them as being factual
Regardless of opinion holds are held to a different standard if your legal argument is no sane person should take Fox News as factual then why should they be given the time of day. Especially since they did not specify that this only referred to opinion host