Anonymous
The pink car has the railway track as their stop sign You stop before the tracks because getting T boned by a train HURTS.[you be dead] There SHOULD BE A STOP SIGN on the other side of the track because it is a 4 way stop. That is just Logical.
Old Man Dirt
At no time when driving is a person excused from avoiding an accident because they had the right of way! The last person who could avoid the accident is often ruled at fault. Often when driving I have come across places where a stop sign has been knocked down and the person unfamiliar with the area would not know they should have stopped.
What I am saying is that all drivers are supposed to yield right of way when it becomes apparent that the other driver is not driving in a safe manner.
So yes, the pink car according to your information has the right of way. But turning traffic is supposed to make sure it is safe to do so before making the turn.
As an old info-mercial in California said-
"Yep, he was right! Dead right!!"
jimanddottaylor
Sounds like you answered your own question an hour ago. As you said, "Its that simple". But then, why are you asking the question ?
Anton
Give me the latitude and longitude of the intersection -- otherwise I will assume that there is a stop sign before the tracks, and will include the intersection.
Question: who has the right of way?
Answer: NO ONE.
Read the law -- no one ever says you have the "right-of way." The law say who is shall yield of "right-of-way." If the other person fails to yield of "right-of-way" you do not have the right to clobber them, you must yield the"right-of-way" if you can.
Abby
well the thing is yes I was in the middle of the intersection about to turn when the silver car decided to just gas it. I was not speeding considering I went over a RAILROAD TRACK. Also the person without the stop sign has the right of way, even though the silver car stopped the pink car still gets to go without stopping. I don’t stop because I DONT HAVE A STOP SIGN. It’s that simple people.