Answer this riddle?

Question

An archeologist and a historian are digging in an old temple ruin. The archeologist finds a coin dated back to 137 B.C. . He hands it over to the historian and they both go to someone to evaluate its value. Turns out, it was worthless. WHY?

bosslady508 · Accepted Answer

The coin could not have been dated as B.C. because if it were before Christ, how would they know Christ would be born?

djarn_djarn · Answer

Coins weren't used back then, so it must have been fake.

Or it was a zimbabwean coin, things are worthless

Yeah, and b.c = before christ, nobody knew he was comming

fAr stAr · Answer

because it was dated 137 B.C. and how possibally could anyone know that Christ will be coming after 137 years. simple.

Chikko Dog · Answer

The coin was just a piece of metal?

Serving Jesus · Answer

Because no one knew when Christ was born before he was born, so it wouldn't be dated 137 BC.

frootiee_tootiee · Answer

B.C. is before christ...and they didn't use coins back then...so it must have been fake.

Henry · Answer

Coins did not exist during that period of time.

vijaykayal · Answer

The mint couldn't have known that Christ was coming

green one (1980) · Answer

because he lied to them! when they threw it away he picked it up from the garbage, sold it and today he is driving a porche

funkytown girl · Answer

because they took it out of the ruin?

Trending News

Answer this riddle?

14 Answers