Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Since Evolution has no evidence and is faith based....?

..why do scientists accept it as fact when it violates the scientific method? Is it because they wish not to be Judged by God?

Update:

You talk of evidence but no one provides any. You can't dispute the leap second. You can't dispute human footprints and dinosaur footprints together.

Evolution is only faith based. Micro evolution is talked about in the flood in genesis. Macro evolutoin is a fairy tale. Can anyone prove that wrong?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Evolution is really a type of religion, but they don't want to admit it.

  • 1 decade ago

    Wow, that is a pretty rough statement... Evolution is the only "theory" that provides scientific evidence. Fossil records, carbon dating, etc.

    creationisms evidence is their lack of evidence... "how can this be possible wothout a god"

    creationists believe that the second law of thermodynamics does not permit order to arise from disorder, and therefore the macro evolution of complex living things from single-celled ancestors could not have occurred. The creationist argument is based on their interpretation of the relationship between probability and a thermodynamic property called "entropy." They are wrong in their interpretation, as is explained in the last link in my sources

    Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution here are some places (over 60) that regect the idea of creationism... you will notice that they are all respected scientific bodies..http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/8408_sta... http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/thermo/probability...
  • carl l
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Your statement "since Evolution has no evidence and is faith based" is false.

    You need to take a course in logic to make a more convincing argument next time.

    "You can't dispute human footprints and dinosaur footprints together."

    Disproven by many credible scientists.

    *****

    You and your argument hve NO credibility.

    Source(s): Life long logical Christian
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There's far more evidence for evolution than there is for God. Evolution is proven fact at micro-biological level, and works very well as a schema or theory for larger organisms' development. Stick that in your magical pipe of religious denial and smoke it.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • I'm pretty sure there is evidence for evolution. If not, I have a lot of pictures of myself standing next to 6,000 year old bones in the Smithsonian when I believed them to be tens of thousands of years old, if not more. What a cruel joke those scientists are playing on us. Since some of you claim it is a religion, who shall I worship and confess my sins to? My local chemist? It is not us in denial.

    Source(s): I believe in God. I believe He seeded this planet, building blocks of life and all.
  • 1 decade ago

    There is quite a bit of evidence across many different fields of science which supports the theory of evolution.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yes. They are soooo afraid of big bad scary God.

  • 1 decade ago

    150 years of evidence that supports it and none that refutes it...no evidence...this is a joke...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.