Do you believe the official account of the fate of United 93 on 9/11?

It has been proven that cell phones did not not work on commercial aircraft in 2001. the only calls you could make on an airline at that time was via the on-board telephone system. NO records exist for those calls.

I do not believe in wild and wacky tin-hat conspiracy theories, That is why I do NOT believe the 'official' version of the 9-11 attacks.

When you investigate ALL the evidence (much of it ignored by the 911 commision) then The US definately had prior warning from the German security services the an attack was going to happen in the form of Aircraft used as missiles on the dates 10th or 11th September 2001. The US accepted and acknowledged reciept of this warning from the Germans and requested that this be kept quiet.

five different 'defence exercises' took place on the 11th September requiring that the USAF and National Guard units who would normally defend the pentagon, whitehouse and New York airspace where off over Alaska chasing fake Russian bogies.

Don Rumsfeld in the previous June ammended the rules of engagement for shooting down civillian aircraft in cases of national emmergency. This meant that instead of a general ordering a shoot-down, it now needed the President, Vice President or the defence secretaries say so too.

This is how the Stand down of teh US air defence systems was enacted to allow the Islamic Patsies to carry out their mission.

None of the alledged Hijackers where on the passenger manifests for these flights. whenever you fly, your name is checked 3 times against the passenger manifest. once at check in, once at departure and again when you board the plane so that special dietary requirements can be satisfied.

NONE of the 19 alledged hijackers made their flights.

6 of them have turned up alive and well elsewhere since 91101.

So WHO where the actual hijackers? we do not know, we only know WHO we are suposed to blame. Arabic flight manuals left in hire cars? suicide notes in luggage that never quite makes it onto the plane? indestructable passports? etc etc.

the official version is so full of holes as to be truly pathetic.

It is not the weakest conspiracy theory surrounding 911, that has to be the aliens did it conspiracy, but the official version is about as weak as it gets.

I have read probably 50 different (but overlapping) versions of what probably happened that day, the official one is one of the weakest versions.

Yes, I do believe the official accounts because there are cockpit recordings found at the wreckage indicating that there were terrorists on board and the notion that the passengers were "hearded" onto some other plane seems a bit far fetched to me. No one has come forward saying, "I was supposed to be on that plane but they moved us to another plane". The conspiracy theories emerging from the aftermath of 9/11 would involve way too many people to pull off successfully. Someone, somewhere would open their mouths because someone always does. The only one's I've seen in my lifetime that kept a secret for any great length of time were the Unibomber (Ted Kaczynski) and Deep Throat (Mark Felt). Ted was a conspiracy of one- real easy to keep secret. Mark was a conspiracy of two: himself and Bob Woodward.

Even IF Flight 93 were shot down, which I don't believe it was or there would be eye-witness accounts from folks on the ground, it still doesn't detract from the evidence of phone calls made from the plane and the passenger revolt. The cockpit recording tells that there was a struggle for control of the plane. The operators that took the 911 calls from passengers have no vested interest in lying about the calls one way or the other.

There are probably many other variables that happened that day that we will never figure out or could not possibly be 'covered up' due to the number of people it would involve.

Rather than believing that the government is an omniscient entity, I choose to put my faith in the people who acted courageously that fateful day. Forever will two word's be burned into my memory and those words can never change how I look at 9/11. Two words that should inspire every American to do what is right in the face of eminent danger. Two words that verify to me that the spirit of America will continue to thrive for generations to come. Two words that confirm in my heart that not even Allah could stop the American spirit in action against it's foes.

"Let's roll!"

You be the judge...Eyewitness and news reports say that they found a debris field of the planecrash of flight 93 to be spread over 8 miles. If the plane had crashed in the woods like the official report stated, then the debris from the crash would've been limited to the crash site alone...Hence, the plane was shot down and it was blown out of the sky.

the respond is very uncomplicated. If the airplane became shot down, there would be debris miles till now the crash internet site. There wasn't any. How can all of us with any brains in any respect say some thing so inane as "i think of it became shot down". it relatively is a intense project, too intense for somebody to have unfastened critiques. And violetmas, how come you reckon physique factors have been strewn throughout - are you telling us you observed that? Are you telling us that they left physique factors laying around which you will work out? The airplane hit the floor at finished velocity. It disintigrated thoroughly and maximum physique factors have been buried interior the floor with lots of the airplane. Cripes, what proportion fool conspiracy theories are we going to get. they do no longer look to be in all probability theories - basically the imaginiations of bored those with too lots time on their arms.

saw the movie flight 93 the other night,it was well done and i agree with everything in it as probably being the truth;but the ending.i don't think we'll ever know for sure if it was taken down by the passengers or shot down.either way i feel that the people on board were all heroes.

Yes. The passengers tried to overpower the terrorists but the one flying rolled the plane and intentionally caused a "loss of separation with the terrain" (aviation-speak.)

I but it, because there were enough people who claimed to have had contact with people onboard to make it plausible. In addition, shooting it down could have been done a little later (closer to targets) without fear of damage in populated areas. Even if the government just wanted to shot the darn thing down, I think finding a pilot to do so that far from danger would be difficult.

There are official accounts of the plane arriving elsewhere. Make your own opinion. Let me know if you agree or disagree.

I think it was probably both. The government doesn't want to have to admit to killing a few of it's own citizens to protect the many.

NO, I do not believe the official account of anything that I did not personally write. Politicians wrote those and gov employees which lie to even themselves.