I've been doing some studying, the big bag theory might be logical?

Exactly - that is just ONE of the reasons that the big-bang theory is so flawed. Even in our society you don't get something for nothing, as the saying goes.

If gases produced an explosion, then something had to create the gases. If molecules created the gases, then something had to create the molecules. The nature surrounding us displays the fact that everything has an origin, and the origin is more complex than what it produces. For example (my details arent' perfect, I'm not a meteorologist - but just for illustration):

To produce something as simple as RAIN, it takes:

Hydrogen (two parts)

Oxygen (one part)

A complex, perfectly balanced atmosphere like our Earths

A temperature fluctuation in this complex atmosphere

Gravity (for the rain to fall)

there's more, but these name a few.

But we need all these things just to get rain! Such a COMPLEX system, perfectly balanced, just to get water to fall from the sky.

Rain has its origins in a system that is superior to itself in design, just like everything else we know.

So where DID those gases come from?

No. That is the central question of cosmology, but it may never be answered. Even were it to be answered, it would not disprove the existence of God.

The problem in your argument is that not having proof that something could come from nothing does not PROVE the existence of god. To steal the theory of Adam Felber - why not a giant invisible lobster that created the universe?

Citing the bible as proof that God had no beginning is not particularly satisfying to the billions of people in the world who do not believe that the Bible is anything more than mythology (Hindus, Bhuddists, etc.)

Einstein's famous equation e=mc2 shows that matter and energy are the same. Superstring theory tells us that the fundamental constituent in nature is a packet of energy. There really is nothing you call matter, only concentrated packets of energy.

Furthermore, Quantum Mechanics tells us that it takes consciousness to collapse the probability field into the state we call matter. So matter is formed when consciousness acts on energy. This is scientific fact and no physicist will argue this.

So consciousness and energy must have pre-existed creation. But whose consciousness and what energy? What better definition of God can exist than that of original source?

In the beginning there was the Creator, the original source. The Creator was all that there was and there was nothing that was not the Creator. The Creator was composed entirely of energy, and was completely conscious and aware of every aspect of it's own Divinity. Just as you might know yourself to be a generous person but would not be able to experience the act of giving generously unless there was someone other than you to whom you could give, the Creator though aware of it's own Divinity could not fully experience itself since all was one.

Therefore the Creator worked out a magnificent plan where all things could be experienced. In a singular moment we call the Big Bang, the energy of the Creator (which we call Love) was converted into the fundamental building block of matter - the photon of light (E=MC2). Through the principles of vibrating energy creation was stratisfied into density layers in the same way the vibrations we call sound stratisfy into harmonic layers. Just like some sound frequencies cannot be detected by your hearing, some densities of creation cannot be directly percieved by our senses.

Some fundamental conclusions (again supported by science) are that:

1. Everything in Creation is an individual expression of the Creator, by the Creator. Therefore every atom, rock, tree, animal, human, planet, star or galaxy is alive with it's own level of consciousness imparted by the Creator.

2. The energy of the Creator is the fundamental constituent of nature from which all things are formed. Therefore there is no separation from the Creator or anything else, this is only an illusion.

3. The gift of the illusion of separation was provided in order that each person could co-create their own variation of experience with absolute free-will. Nonetheless, it is still an illusion, in reality all-is-one.

Truth is, your very existence here is proof of the Creator. You were created BY the Creator, OF the Creator, and you exist in a highly detailed holographic environment that overlays true reality.

Like an actor in a daytime soap opera, the character you are playing now is not the real you, you are merely acting out your dramas on this stage of visible light.

Unlike a scripted TV show however, this play is an improvisation, and you are a co-creator of the entire production.

There is what appears to be a paradox regarding the big bang until you study it in depth.

Even though it is of finite age, it has no beginning per se, which means it was not created. This seems paradoxical until you realize that time itself is part of the universe and is relative to an observer.

If it were possible to travel backward in time toward the big bang singularity, you would never actually reach it even if you travelled for all eternity from your perspective. This is the result of relativity. It's actually quite a bit more complex than that, but this is a good enough description.

From our present vantage point, the big bang appears to be of finite age based on our relative measure of time from our vantage point. But this is a linear extrapolation that isn't really valid. It's convenient to use because it's apporximately valid until you get very close to the singularity, but then it breaks down.

From the perspective of the big bang itself, it is eternal.

That said, keep in mind that everything we theorize about the universe is subject to revision.

i'm an Abrahamic theist, muslim to be right, besides, I trust vast bang and 0.5 of evolution, this is interior the Qur'an The Qur'an stated that each thing interior the worldwide variations different than for the writer, isn't that a referance of the evolution thought? additionally the vast Bang thought is interior the Qur'an... additionally Harun Yahya is a dumb and ignorant Muslim

What kind of bag are we discussing?Shopping bag, trash bag, douche bag? I have never heard of the big bag theory please explain it to me. Oh wait I know...it's like a Tom and Jerry cartoon where Jerry blows up a bag and pops it so it makes a really loud noise and gives Tom a false since of security then he gets blown up by the bomb he set as a trap?

Why is it relevent? Do you spend a lot of time wondering what your life was like before you were born?

The concept of "nothing" ain't so bad. There's also nothing wrong in saying "we don't know". That's no reason to attribute it to a god.

I don't know why my perriwinkles didn't bloom well this summer, but the default answer is NOT "god did it".

Of course it is true, it is even supported by God word;

Have not those who disbelieved known that the heavens and the earth were one connected entity, then We separated them?... (21:30)

Then He turned to the heaven when it was smoke... ( 41:11)

I LIKE the big bag theory! lol Makes as much sense as creationism.

I don't see how a random explosion could even eventually create a planet so perfect, that it is able to sustain so many forms of life. Just look at Earth. If you look at the bottom of a pinecone or at a sea shell, they have perfect patterns on them. Look at our ecosystem. Its all too perfect to come from nothing.