Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
If the law states all passengers must wear seat belts then why, by God, are school buses the option?
This is insane to me!
11 Answers
- southwindLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
Very good point lalily............ I've voiced that for years. The most important commodity we have is our children. But they have only just recently started installing seat-belts in school buses. The problem was really one of economics. The buses would have to have shorter routes because the driver would have to wait until each child had buckled up after getting aboard the bus. That would translate into more buses, more drivers, and more fuel and maintenance. Politicians know that means increased taxes. They can't win votes by increasing taxes. Many people don't have children and don't care if the children are safe if it means they might have to pay higher taxes. So the insurance companies that forced seat-belts laws into legislation made a loophole in it along with the lawmakers to help politicians keep their jobs. It's all about money............not safety.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
The seat backs on the school bus are made taller to act as a safety devise qnd take the place of the belt. Besides can you imagine trying to insure that all of the kids fasten their belts and then having to help them with the release when it's time to get off.
- jeanLv 41 decade ago
My husband has been saying that for years. Our kids are the most precious thing we have. Maybe a politican should really jump on this and keep his promise to us.I can remember when I was young our bus even had kids standing for a short time during our trip or maybe four of us sitting in the same seat.
- trigunmarksmanLv 61 decade ago
The option should at least be available on buses. I know the very few buses that had seatbelts, I used them. It's a shame to save a few bucks and bet against children's lives.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- freemansfoxLv 41 decade ago
Yes, it is but the weird part is that the preschoolers and the kindergartners have to be seat belted in but not the rest of the kids.
Source(s): Husband is a bus driver - AmberLv 41 decade ago
Because that law is for private vehicles.
School buses, cabs, city transit buses, medical transportation, airport limos ect...all public
- 1 decade ago
i've always wondered this too. the only answer anyone has ever given me has to do with the size of the vehicle. if a school bus hits another vehicle it's more likely to just run right over whatever it hits. but then, what if it hits like a semi truck or something???? or what if it hits another schoolbus???? hell, i don't know.
- 1 decade ago
I think that maybe, since children aren't taxpayers, the people in charge don't figure that they are worth saving, yet.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Kids don't generate revenue, as schools take revenue, it's a losing proposition ,and you can bank on that.
I AM