Is anybody on Heather Mills' side, after what shes doing do Paul Mccartney?

Funny how a guy who was married for 30 years and would have had a marriage that lasted forever if Linda hadn't died of cancer, has four children that adore him including Linda's daughter whom he adopted is all of a sudden an abusive and cruel husband after only 4 years with Heather? He bought her act hook, line and sinker and skipped the prenup because he was still grieving for Linda. If Heather loved her daughter, she'd quit slinging mud and take only the money any woman would get for spending four years on her back for the cash only.

I agree with Daniel, we can't judge fully. The media are brilliant at stirring things up and telling lies about famous people and we all stupidly believe it!!This divorce has nothing to do with anyone except the McCartneys. I think it's poor taste to keep ridiculing Heather because she lost a leg- she is a human being with feelings and to be cruel about someone who is disabled is very low.

I think the lesson here is to not rush into marriages when you are clearly grieving the loss of your soulmate whom you still love.This will never make for a long relationship.

Personally I couldn't care less about the Heather Mills and Paul McCartney case, I just want them both out of the papers so we can concentrate on more important things. No offence but they're only human and I can think of plenty more worthwhile human beings to discuss than them. By all means they should get divorced, but can't they keep it private?

Heather

No, mainly because:

How come she has tapes of their arguments?

1. She must have already had the tapes running or prepared.

2. This means that to any jury, there is a strong case that the taped arguments were actually pre-planned and contrived by her to use at a future point.

3. This puts the truth and real motives of anything she says into doubt and the case should be thrown out.

Exactly. Just look at her smutty, money-grabbing past and compare it to Paul's. If all those allegations about him and his behaviour are true, why did Linda never have any problems with him when they were married?

He's just another megastar who has been used and abused because of their well-earned status and money, just like Michael Jackson was. The things people do to snatch a bit of the fame and fortune for themselves is unbelievable.

did you see the morning hospital program last week heather mills was on and she brought up how she lost her leg in a car accident then 20 minutes later someone else asked her and replied a police bike hit her as she crossed a road. she can't even get that right on live t.v

I don't think I believe she was abused but on the other hand remember the Beatles song 'Getting Better'

I used to be cruel to my woman I beat her

and kept her apart from the things that she loved

Man, I was mean but I'm changing my scene

and I'm doing the best that I can

Like i said I don't THINK I believe her, but i'm keeping an open mind, there could be some truth in that verse.

Well, she was always a gold digger but quite frankly there's no fool like an old fool and she certainly fooled him! He should have listened to his family who MUST have been warning him against her - shame they will be the long term losers when she wipes out several million that they should have inherited. However, there will still be plenty left for them.

However, because of my loyalty to him (and to Linda) I cannot side with hopalong.

I think it is sad. I do not believe anything she says. I saw one person on late night call her a "one legged freak." Now, that is a bit harsh, but I think it just illustrates that she really is not very popular right now in the eyes of the public.