Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Does Fergie bother you too?

I recently watched Fergie's new video "Fergielicious" on MTV and couldn't believe my eyes. I was on the treadmill at the time so I really didn't hear the song, but what the heck was she wearing? A girl scout uniform that looks like something a stripper would wear? How could she be so stupid! Young girls are watching (well hopefully not watching) this and look up to her as a role model. How can we prevent these women from dressing and acting like strippers and give women in this world some dignity. How can someone respect a person who has to dress like that. I know sex sells...apparently she needs the money. I'm not a prude, honestly, but when you have a video with kids and a candyland type of background who do you think is going to watch it?

19 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I know how you feel, I see girls dress up like sluts and I feel so sorry for them, they don't realize that if they dress up like trash, they'd be treated like one too, how can one think of being treated with respect with one's boobs bursting out of their skimpy tops, I would never respect a guy who dressed with his crotch hanging out, may be they dont have a life so they need this kind of attention to prove their self worth to themselves,

  • Jojo
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Her look is very skanky. We all know that she can sing and that she has a nice body, so why is she still so "exposed"? I guess that while she has singing talent, she lacks that in the clothing department. She has no class, at least not publicly.

    When it comes down to the kids, let's give some benifit of the doubt to the people raising them and that these parents have had enough time to spend with their children and show them the wrong from right.

    There is a big difference between reality and entertainement.

    The sad truth is that I see kids walking around, dressed as like they were in a music video.

    I am sure that on her "days off" Fergie dresses somewhat appropriet and I really hope that in her closet she has a shirt that is full length.

    Other then that (phew!) I do like and enjoy her music.

  • 1 decade ago

    I fully agree with what your talking about... but... its a part of life.

    If a young lady has a great family to help her see that its all just a phase & that she'll grow out of it. Then she will.

    But if a young lady sees that her parents say its okay for her to wear thongs at 12 & dress like a Girl Scout that is selling tickets to her poll dance instead of cookies (Fergie)... then she will.

    You asked: "how can we prevent these women from dressing & acting like strippers..."

    Start at home... If you see your lil sister is gawking at this video & others.. tell her something. Make her see things in a whole new light. Be a role model. & If you have a lil girl yourself... do whats right with her life. Try to teach her that life doesnt revolve around superficial materials & a mans approval of her body.

    I hope this answers some of your questions & hopefully someone elses as well.

  • 1 decade ago

    i'm a young girl, but i have not seen it yet. though, my friend ericka has. but i have seen london bridge, it wasnt good, ok ill just say it, it sucked. she should stay with the peas and yea, she is a stripper i think, like a few years ago. and by the way, im thinking why she was wearing a stripper outfit was because women think, well some do, that if they strip, millions of guys will ask them out. why do i know so much? i've taken sex ed.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    of direction United purchase gamers. What helpful team does not? yet does the time element no longer come into something you suggested? because of the fact the 07/08 season city have spent close to to 530mil on gamers as much as now. interior the comparable volume of time United have spent close to to 200mil on gamers. quite huge distinction.. over 50%. Is that no longer substantial? I suggested the above just to throw the figures obtainable, yet i do no longer think city are 'paying for the league'. they have components available and that they are utilising it. no longer something incorrect with that as long as they stay interior the guidelines. of direction FFP would substitute issues interior the destiny, yet until eventually then, no longer lots can ensue. So user-friendly sufficient in the event that they % to purchase gamers, it somewhat is no longer something the recreation hasn't considered in the previous. Like I suggested each huge club does it. yet even city's huge spending temporarily time isn't that good sized of a deal.. I recommend Madrid and Chelsea have the two completed that interior the previous. EDIT: I doubt that understanding FFP replaced into entering effect made the club "rapidly construct". i'm quite particular they might have completed so besides only because of the fact they'd. of direction FFP is on the horizon and that they might've undemanding, yet I doubt that they might decelerate the transfers if FFP wasn't a element. Yeah I do agree that many golf equipment did push their fees up while city got here knocking. yet however, this is their own fault. They have been people who began to furnish over the precise sums of money to gamers and that at modern-day inflated the marketplace and have been given those different golf equipment annoying extra money for their skills while city replaced into fascinated. As harsh because it somewhat is this is strictly what happens while a club gadgets the hot standards interior the flow marketplace, it effects valuation all around. @Delboy: "one 0.5 of Milli Vanilli" hahahaha

  • 1 decade ago

    Nah, she doesn't bother me. I think she is a very attractive woman, she's just young. My daughter watches her videos and all the other crap that's on television that's under PG 13. When I was a teen I watched all the junk videos just like she does and my parents hated it. I don't buy that stuff for her and she knows she can't wear that revealing clothing. I don't think it's what is on television, I think it's our responsibility as parents to limit what our children watch and ensure they realize that isn't appropriate it's for "entertainment only".

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    That's not what bugs me....it's the fact that she is a "but-her-face" and that she can sing about London Bridges and make people buy it! Sort of like how Gwen Stefani lost my respect when she spelled Bananas in a song and people thought it was "art"

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Only if I leave the sound on. She is a great artist with the mute button on.

  • 1 decade ago

    Despite the fact u're quite right i really like her music:)

  • 1 decade ago

    actually, it does piss me off too! i dont think shes looking for respect from others but a pay.

    i believe they re using kids too promote their music and its sad.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.