Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Did anybody here actually watch the OJ trial?
Or are you saying guilty because you think he must be?
The trial I watched clearly proved the case was a frame job from the word go.
Every piece of forensic evidence provided by the prosecution was proven to be unreliable or tainted. The only DNA expert was Dr Lee and he said OJ was innocent.
"People don't bleed preservatives."
10 Answers
- RebeccaLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
I was 25 years old and working at a newspaper in the newsroom when this trial was happening. I remember sitting, stunned when the verdict was read, and everyone around me exploding in disbelief! The more time that elapses since the trial, the harder it may be for some to remember the massive amounts of evidence that were presented, and that the only reason this trial ended in acquittal was because the police screwed up quite a bit.
BTW, I know Henry Lee is a very well-respected forensic scientist, but I think he's so self-promoting that he would do anything and say anything to get on television, including (but not limited to) saying what the people who are paying him want to hear!!
- 1 decade ago
I am 19, so i was young during this trial. But I do remember seeing a few sceens on the TV but i couldn't tell you what was going on or anything. As far as me deciding if he was guilty or not, i didn't see enough evidence or a decent amount of trial to decide, And had i saw any amount, like i was saying i was too young to decide guilty or innocent.
- 1 decade ago
Actually i remember quite vividly the Exact time and location of the trial because I was defending Macbeth in a mock trial which of course he was acquited on. Less there be a preponderance of a doubt or qualm of conscience. I was actually quite astounded that he did I mean what innocent man doesnt go for a three + hour tour of on the free way in a white bronco when the world is watching and of course the jury was unable to take into consideration. This always posed a dilemma for me. anyways out damn spot out i say.
- CinnerLv 71 decade ago
I watched it from beginning to end, the man is guilty. His defense team got a gift from Mark Furman when he lied about using the *N* word. From then on it was all about race. I can't believe there is actually someone out there who still believes he is innocent. You must have great faith in humanity.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 decade ago
Do you honestly think if OJ was innocent he would of went on TV this week and said how he would of done it???
I think the limelight he received from the double murder was wearing off and no one was paying him any attention, so he had to come up with his latest stunt.
Perhaps guilt drove him to rehash the double murder of two innocent people... Think about it...
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Unbelievable. You must have watched a different trial than I did.
Source(s): I don't care what you think! - Anonymous1 decade ago
i saw it he is guilty as hell the only reason he got off was because he is a famous black guy and black people would never find him guilty and if they did the rest of the black community would burn down LA like with Rodney King but it would of been worse
- Anonymous1 decade ago
whos this o.j simpson everyones talkin bout