Which is the best Linux distribution for home use ? And why?

Ubuntu is pretty user-friendly, and it's Debian based so there is a vast base of software available for it. Fedora Core is the free development branch of Red Hat Linux, and my personal favorite. It also has large amounts of packaged software specifically targeted to it's users. Mandriva is one of the easiest and most foolproof installations, and is more targeted toward the not so techies out there. Debian, Gentoo, and Suse require a little more knowledge of the Gnu/Linux OS, but are very powerful distros once you get used to stuff like command line in a terminal and such. Whichever you choose to start with, just jump in there! It's all free or nearly free, and runs just fine on an old $50 or $75 P3 that you can get off of Craigslist (or find in the dumpster if you are lucky!). Download the ISO, burn the disc, and see how you like the distro. If you don't like one then install another. Ubuntu will even mail you the install CDs for free if you don't have a CD burner or a fast internet connection.

To learn it, use Ubuntu Linux. It's by FAR the best Linux distro out there for beginners. It is based on the fantastic Debian. Never...NEVER use Linux as the sole O.S on your computer if you are new to it. ALWAYS partiton your drive or use a second drive and install Linux on that and dual boot, so if you don't like it, you still have XP :D.

yes, the ubuntu Linux distribution is the best for home use. and also you can easily get the free CD's from their site. just search for Ubuntu Linux site and from there order free CD's , the best thing is that you can check all things without installing anything ;)

it will just reboot from CD and wow you have complete Linux OS running. and if you want to install it . there is an option to install.

i'd frequently say, lots of the Debian distributions are ultimate on your known laptop person to apply at residing house -- in no small area through fact they're the main forgiving and maximum inexpensive in terms of hardware use. those comprise PCLinuxOS, *buntus, Linux Mint, gNewSense, Crunchbang Linux and rattling Small Linux. a number of those, quite gNewSense and DSL have technical aspects which intimidate clientele in the beginning up --DSL replaced into initially a technical stunt to in good shape an entire OS on no extra suitable than 80MB. it is MB, no longer GB, Redmond. i'm not sure why yet once you supply the two of those 2 "technical" distros to a non-technical person, they often times adapt to the unusual classes very properly and discover them easier to apply than the *buntus or Linux mint. i've got watched it some million/2 a dozen circumstances, and study it extra. Slax is a competent one. Slackware is equipped on the coverage "shop it user-friendly stupid" and whilst it somewhat is for engineers, Slax and dyne:bolic are outstanding at doing what they do -- frugally. i do no longer propose Dyne:bolic for residing house use. I do propose it as a transportable stay cd "for media activists" that's its suggested purpose, and that i discover it very useful that way, regardless of the undeniable fact that it is so on the edge of slackware in case you desire to place in an OS you are able to as properly only have a geek set up slackware. That outcomes interior the ideal situation. whilst Fedora and purple Hat are somewhat extra useful for place of work use ANY Linux is SO customizable you have an astounding sort of folk who use them at residing house, luckily. Mandriva is stable, yet as stressful on the hardware as Fedora whilst no longer being fairly as useful, and Suse is Suse. i'd say bypass with a Debian distro. in all probability no longer Debian, yet one among its derivativex

If you are migrating from WindBlows, there are several look-alikes to choose from FreeSpire looked so much like M$ windows, they sued over the name Lindows.....

I run DEBIAN, myself. The Swiss Army Knife of O/S..