Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Technically speaking on the Royal Family...?
....how are they that much different than a family in the UK spending their whole lives living on welfare? Put them in a smaller home, cheaper clothes, more basic food, and you have another family living off the taxes of the people that actually have jobs. How's it that much different? What is it exactly I'm not getting?
2 Answers
- joannaserahLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Well, the fact that the Royal Family can go and do as they please whenever and wherever they want. A family on welfare can't. If they tried, they might be arrested. They can't afford to move or take a vacation on a whim. They don't receive foreign guests who are taken care of fully.
Besides, people do work to get off welfare, the RF doesn't.
Your argument is silly, plus why not just get rid of the Royal Family altogether. That'd probably save more a year than getting rid of welfare.
- Anonymous4 years ago
the version between any wealthy family contributors and a welfare family contributors is that the wealthy family contributors has a heritage of an ancestor or 2 who laid down a starting up for them so generations after them did no longer might want to artwork like the conventional human being. A family contributors on welfare are both those who do not pick to artwork, or have worry searching lengthy time period artwork. The royal households of the international are literally not welfare human beings, they are the rulers and/or social impacts on their kingdoms and elsewhere.
