Should Bush get indicted or impeached before the end of his term?

If any president deserves that it's the present one, more even than Nixon.

He is the world's most dangerous terrorist and a war criminal.

The blood of millions is on his hands and those of his greedy pals. He seems not to be totally sane, what with hearing the voice of god, and talking the way he does.

How anyone sane can still believe that what he did and is still doing is in the best interest of the US is beyond me. He most definitely did not keep his oath of office, so he deserves to be impeached, and his vice president with him. They also should be tried in the Hague as war criminals. That's not going to happen, I know, but it's what SHOULD happen.

And still there are enough people around who clap and call him a good leader.

As Einstein said: "The universe and human stupidity know no limits, but we are not sure about the universe."

don't be so naive. Obama is inflating the dimensions of authorities, and subtly and cleverly infusing Socialism into our equipment of authorities. All this at the same time as accumulating a enormous unswerving cult-following, Why in the international would he get impeached for that? won't be able to you word that the authorities has obviously made the alternative to advance this is length, and right more desirable administration over societal judgements. i'm no longer being sarcastic both. for the reason that Bush, and 9-11, the unofficial-reliable coverage is for the authorities to ascertain administration over very nearly each thing it ought to damage out with. - this is attending to some extent now the position the actually time we vote is at the same time as an election takes position. Obama is an agent of Socialism and massive authorities and there is a great deal a lot less human beings in political workplace who're adverse to that than you may imagine. such an excellent type of persons look to imagine he's this leftist Democratic radical and do not realize that in the back of-the-scenes the Republicans are applauding him too. the most important wool pulled over the eyes of individuals is the concept the Democrats and Republicans are completely seperate events at the same time as in truth they are not. check out how quickly President Obama is one hundred eighty'ing on each Democratic-depending selection he claimed to represent. before the 365 days is up, with all his back-peddling and revising of innovations, his moves would have taken on a completely new type and be lots in route of Republican. he's a Demopublican, a blend of both, and his plans are only like timber, which we are going to start up to work out further and extra, and are already seeing now. he's wearing on the route President Bush began, and that route is what our authorities envisions for us of a of america. there is not any longer some thing to question him for, he's doing precisely what he's informed (by using each of the persons with the potential to question). Bail-outs, CEO firings, massive spending picked up by using higher taxation, and so on. no longer some thing right here to question says Uncle Sam. enable's pass on to the subsequent question.

While this sounds fun, where would it stop? We could play impeach each others presidents for the next 200 years and get no where. Lets end the hate and start working together as a nation to get stuff done and help people.

would be political suicide for the dems.. if they want a chance at having a full house on the goverment in 08 they shouldnt even try it.. they have a two year grace period here to show they can accomplish something and if they waste it in an impeachment hearing which they still don't have a 2/3 majority to do anything it would just be pie in the face for the dems and most liekly make them look bad enought to have no chance of a president elected.. but i wish them well.. I'd rather see reds in goverment anyways

he's not a good president, this we know. but 50% of the things you hear about him are far left propaganda and stand up comedians striking the iron while its hot. Iraq isnt a good thing, i wont deny that, but to say he is soley to blame for that is ridiculous. he has no grounds to be impeached and you know it. he hasnt done anything legally wrong. hes just a politician. they lie. They have agendas. He is guilty of fulfilling his stereotype, thats about it.

No, Hillary he shouldn't. Also Bill called said he'd be late. Something about stopping off for a Monica Burger.

You two must be tag teaming it... well my answer is No.

What McKinney did there was less about President Bush and more about her own ego.

Good Riddance.

Nope

No why should he. Other Presidents have done far worst things than he has done and remained in office. Wish we could have him another term!!!!!!

yes