Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How exactly did van helsing cost more than revenge of the sith?

And it looked so fake, while revenge of the sith looked real (mostly). For that matter, how did miami vice cost more than revenge of the sith?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I would say traveling. I don't know if Van Helling was shot on location, but they definitely went to a lot of different places to set up. Miami Vice was shot in Miami, Haiti, and Havanna. Plus to rent a large ship and get other people to clear the water. That stuff is expensive - not to mention Moby's fee.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well, maybe it was because most of the effects for the Episode films were done in house by George Lucas at ILM (Industrial Light and Magic), Lucas' Effects company. Remember, Most films are farmed out to different industry companies to be made for Studios. Effects, Makeup, Post Production, etc... Lucas is self sufficient. Lucasfilm Ltd. Is a studio in and of itself, he can produce and make his own films, Skywalker Ranch, his compund out in California has sound stages and Effects houses and everything most Studio Lots have on them, so i would imagine being able to do most of the expensive things himself, actually does limit cost expenditures.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.