Saddam Hussien or Bush?

Great question! Bush isn't just killing Iraqis. He is a psychopath, killing Americans too. Contrary to what you hear in the government-controlled media, there is no terror (beyond the usual region-specific revolutionary type that's always existed). 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. and Israel (see scholarsfor911truth.org/), but for different reasons. The U.S. will begin building a NAFTA Superhighway next year that stretches from the S. Texas Mexican border through the Midwest up to Canada for the purpose of facilitating a North American Union parallel to the European Union (see Congressman Ron Paul's website). The Christian West recognizes through the revelations in Samual P. Huntington's book, "Clash of Civilizations" that they will never get the Muslim world to accept this one world globalization, so we need to create pretexts for wars against the Muslims. 9/11 was made possible by carrying out 15 different "war games" by the military simultaneously and at the same location of the "attacks". Same thing in london on 7/7 (again, see scholarsfor911truth.org/). The British authorities were carrying out "anti-terrorism" exercises at the exact same time and location as the bombings. The Indonesian authorities have investigated the Bali bombing and the trail leads to the U.S. military (Guardian October 27, 2002). Same thing with the Spain train bombing. The U.S. military pays "contracters" $30,000 per month (per Melissa Rossi, "What every American should know about who runs the World), to carry out "military operations". Have you heard any more about the anthrax letters since the Baltimore Sun reported that the very unique weapons grade used was traced to a U.S. military lab? (There's a Patriot Act to pass, we can't have dissenters in congress.) So the war on terror is a fabrication to minimize the muslim numbers and establish puppet presidents in Muslim countries. The masses mostly consist of simple people who are very easy to fool. The U.S. Intelligence agencies specialize in false flag attacks and influencing elections in foreign countries through clever propaganda. (Our intelligence agencies were not born yesterday and there is no organization better at deception-have you any idea how many false films they've produced, including Flight 93?).The press is the key. But the U.S. cannot control the foreign press, so stories like the following are written and linked to the internet: "Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" by BBC News on September 23, 2001; "Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11 by the Guardian Observer on October 27, 2002". There are hundreds more, including an interview with Osama soon after 9/11 where he explains that he had no involvement with 9/11 and why. (The December, 2001 "confession" video has been proven a fraud-more propaganda by CIA/Mossad). Everything was fabricated (cell phones did not work at 30,000 feet in 2001, and if Marc Bingham did call his mom, he wouldn't say, "hi mom, this is Marc Bingham". But the masses are very easy to fool. Show an explosion and TELL them what happened and they buy it hook, line and sinker. By the way, skyscrapers do not collapse by fire. During WWII a B-52 bomber flew into the Empire State Building. It burned for awhile but these building are built to withstand multiple airplane hits, as attested by the WTC construction mgr, Frank Demartini on the History Channel. And when you do a "review" of the call on the field by revisiting the "attack" you can see that instead of burning down, the towers were getting blown to kingdom come with explosives, the very thing that the witnesses attest to in the dvd's and the internet videos. Now you know why Bush resisted an investigation (which he later loaded with insiders who wrote the biggest lie since Santa Clause). Now you know why Bush refused to testify under oath. Now you know why Bush insisted that Cheney be at his side during his interview. Now you know why 9/11 is not among the crimes listed on the FBI website of Osama Bin Laden. Now you know why no one was reprimanded or fired for allowing 9/11 to happen. Now you know why the Patriot Act was on Ashcroft's desk on September 10, 2001. Now you know why most of the Bush gang with any sintilla of a concious has "resigned", such as General Tommy Franks, Karen Hughes, Colin Powell, and scores of others. Franks is quoted in Senator Bob Graham's book, "Intelligence Matters" as saying "This is not a war on terror". Indeed it isn't Mr. Franks. Now you know why Pat Tillman was killed by "friendly fire" after he became outspoken on how bogus the war was (as reported in Sports Ilustrated Magazine). Again, there is no war on terror. The U.S. needs a significant military presence in Eurasia to stifle any challenge to its global supremacy. Pat Tillman did not appreciate giving up his NFL career to be the oil police. But that is what our military is doing in Afghanistan. Do you really believe that a bunch of rag tag towel heads with no air force, no navy, no cruise missles, no helicopters, no uniforms, no canteens, no nothing can hold off and resurge against the world's sole global superpower???? Remember the Gulf War in 1991? How long did it take the U.S. to remove the fourth largest army in the world from Kuwait? TWO MONTHS!!!!!!!!!!!! And FIVE YEARS later, we're losing the "war" in Afghanistan? Yeah, right. Now you know why the U.S. government refuses to answer the dozens of questions of the families of the 9/11 victims as shown in the dvd, Press for Truth. Now you know why the 9/11 Truth Movement reps are yelled at and discredited with name calling in the mainstream media. You people need to decide if you are sheep or your own thinker. Your government is decieving you to your grave and you just keep sleeping. I know, I know, our government would not do such a thing. Google "Operation Northwoods" and your political naivete will lump up in your shorts. The 9/11 attack was actually drawn up in 1962 as a hit on Cuba, intentionally kiliing Americans. It was to be blamed on Castro so we could remove him militarily. Kennedy, the peacemaker, rejected it and the plan has been sitting on the shelf waiting for the Neoconservative establishment to revive it, only at a different location. As Zbig Brzezinski wrote in "The Global Chessboard", "...it is more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances OF A TRULY MASSIVE AND WIDELY PERCEIVED DIRECT EXTERNAL THREAT." Guess what 9/11 was folks? It was a TRULY MASSIVE AND WIDELY PERCEIVED DIRECT EXTERNAL THREAT! Yeah, create an explosion and TELL the people what they saw and...lets roll...

Stay informed. Get your news from the internet, dvd's, and the international press. And inform others. This is our country. Eventually...we will tell...Bush...

Geez.... should I even bother???

Your basic question is invalid. saddam was not killed because he killed 100 people. He was killed because he was found guilty of a crime in his country.

Bush has been accused of many things, primarily because many do not like his politics. These accusations are based on emotions rather than fact.

Signing a petition will not get Bush impeached. Petitions are for "recall' of local politicians when the local folks don't approve of their performance. Impeachment proceedings are initiated by congress when there is evidence of criminal wrong doing.... as when Clinton lied under oath, or when Nixon was involved with illegal wiretaps at Watergate hotel.

i think ur hitting in the right target, well let me keep the person aside say true or lie , hell or heaven, it takes lot of pain who is right and wrong, but one is democratic leader other one is miltery ruler.

it was what u sow is u r reap, how can any one forget that WTO attack same way if u get into the core of the subject it gets opens and veryu deeper u will see why Mr.Bush is done that may be there is some poltical influence i agree,

I am sorry for that what u said killed more than 100000 but why Iraq is given room to enter the Bush, after many talking it was Mr. Sadam, turned the world and showed his mind and never bothered all this consequence and do u really say this is correct.

Alright if he is correct why can not talk with the world committe and there was also chance to prove is words and intention to keep the safe Iraq i too know at the age of 20 he started the life in Poltical and at the age of 22 he become the highest post of the nation.

He is dicated and termed the nation

Just i need to tell u

if iam wrong when some is finger me i have to see what is that and how it

go with my futur and it is the matter of one nation and just i cannot keep striking the arms with neighbour country and say we are safe

Sorry I feel we have forget the individuality and think of the nationality and pupils safety is one decision is taken this and inspite of the reapeated talk it is happend

I am sure u know better what i am telling

the final word is for the sake of family one man can scarifice, for the sake of one village let one home goes scarifice, for cause of nation one village go scarifice

if u think still it is happening please think ahead, think better, big for our futur generation what we are leaving to them

i am still 28 it makes to think may be u r thinking in different way

we have to keep this earth say land peaceful , greenful as nature for our futur generation it is our responsibilty what do u think we got

THE GREAT POWER COMES WITH GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES

do u know there is lot opposition in the US for Bush

pupils in US are really good civilised and character they never hurt any one for no reason dont u think

when u call for war they never keep back right

i Hope u understand what iam telling

if thinking is hurting u I am extermely sorry freind

i too completely agree with U. america killed saddam due to its own rivalry... who gave america the right to punish the president of any contry.

george bush has killed saddam by conspiracy.

that has left many questions unanswered such as : why he has been hung on the day of eid? that too just before new year.?

the other contries can do nothing coz america is the present super natural power in the world........'

THATS DISGUSTING.

In my opinion I believe that Bush is almost as bad as Saddam. If it weren't for Bush's vendetta against Saddam we wouldn't have our troops in Iraq. Bush and his administration tried to do anything they could to find links between Iraq and 9/11 even though there was no link. In my opinion Bush has sent thousands of our troops to their deaths! Hopefully Bush will be impeached. If we can impeach Clinton about lying about his affair which basically was a personal matter, we can surely impeach Bush!

Americans won't do anything about it. they're too afraid to stand up for what they believe is right because of the consequences. I'm too ashamed to call myself American now.

Bush is killing thousands and thousands of his own people every day. when will he realize that he is doing wrong?

at least Saddam had some brains to know what he was doing was wrong(if he ever did it). apparently Bush doesn't have any, cuz he's still doing it!

Justice is described by the victors. I recently asked a question about going to bed with the CIA. I asked if you would wake up with a death sentence. I got very few replies.

Bush should be tried by an international court. But with such a large military at his command, that will not happen.

The Criminal Saddam Is the worst leader in the world, he killed more than million Iraqi people (not 100 ) he destroyed his country and let millions of Iraqi people go out side Iraq. He deserves the death 100 times.

The problem is not just Bush, it's also his panel of advisors. He is a puppet and they pull the strings. He is a simple-minded pathetic man who does what Rumsfeld and Condaliza tell him to do. They are just as guilty as the dumb man himself.

Right, perfect question!!

If ever there was a poll of favouritism of.. Saddam or Bush.. it would undoubtedly be Saddam..cos he atleast had some brains!!

Ask w's daughters to go serve in Iraq

Notice I put w in lower case letters he dosent deserve to be capitalised.