Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If the Democrats held the presidential office throughout the 80s, would the cold war still be going on?

Democrats' responses to hostile threats typically involve some sort of pacifistic deferral to the enemy. If Reagan and Bush I were replaced by their Democratic counterparts, would the U.S. still be battling the USSR and other nations in a neverending cold war with communism?

14 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I think WWIII would have happened - allow me to explain:

    Everyone knows that Communism does not work, and yes, it was Reagan that quickly bankrupted them by escalating the arms race. But had there been no Reagan, the bankruptcy of the USSR would have happened much more slowly, causing them to get more and more desparate and paranoid over time. I believe that eventually, the President of the USSR would have thought the only way to survive would be to launch an all out Nuclear war in hopes that they would win, thus saving their nation by living off the spoils of victory.

    So yes, Republicans saved the world once again.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I would gladly take the old cold war over a much more dangerous, no end in site, war on terror. At least with the cold war you knew who the enemy was and how to defend against them and with MAD in place nobody was going to use nukes. With this war on terror nobody has any idea what might happen like a without any warning WMD/Nuke attack on the US by terrorists. The cold war kept the world in a nice balance of power and in today's world there is no balance of power and that is more dangerous than the cold war.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well, the Soviet Union was collasping from the 60's all the way through the early 1990s because it was not sustainable economically. Stalin's programs were not sound enough to be able to provide enough economic strength to stop the collaspe if the USSR. Its failure was bound to happen regardless of who was in the office of the President. Politics aside the Cold War was on the outs regardless of who was in office

  • jxt299
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Does your rant against Democrats by any chance include President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who led not just the United States, but the whole Allied cause, against Germany and Japan during WW2? Or President Wilson, who led the US and England against Germany in WW1? Where do you get such nonsense? And give some credit to the Russians for ditching Communism, they did a lot more to end it than your empty suit presidents ever did.

    And Republicans like to forget this, but it is true--they were the pacifist lets be nice to Hitler side before WW2 involved the US.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    no... reagan presided over the fall of russia, it had nothing to do with bush sr. also, you forget that there were other presidents who preceded reagan who kept up the arms race which led to the implosion of the ussr.

    the fall of the ussr was inevitable. it crumbled from the inside. reagan deserves credit for being there to help them recover when gorbachev asked for aid. but he did not do it alone, that is ignorant of the role the middle east played and the rest of history.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    La la la. The cold war was mostly a farce propagated by the hyper reactionary warmongers. Sound familiar?

    Stupidity begets stupidity.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    I heard that they had shrink back on investment so as they had to scrimp on cardboard this 365 days. So this is going to be a shrink-out of that skinny, cracked out Paris Hilton. they are going to be getting the toddlers to entice herpes on her, so this is going to a minimum of be a correct parent of her.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The Cold War would have been won, but by the Soviets instead...

    We would have been citizens of the North American SSR.

  • 1 decade ago

    no.

    the soviet union fell for two reasons:

    the war in afganistan drained their treasury.

    socialism as a method of running either a society or an economy doesn't work.

    let me know if this isn't clear and i'll retype everything in all caps for you...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.