Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
12 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Europe. Our armed forces are worn too thin right now.
In a war between US and European citizens, Europeans would definitely win. Most Americans are too fat to even stand up without rolling their fat asses to one side first.
- Crusader1189Lv 51 decade ago
It depends. If England isn't involved on Europe's side, then the USA has it easy. Reasoning: France will surrender after token resistance and a threat to the wine/cheese industry develops. The Italian government will fall (several times) and their tanks will go the wrong way. The Germans will get bogged down in existential thought and not fight.
The reason England would help Europe win is because they can only win when they are outnumbered and outgunned (a situation easily helped by having Continental Europeans as "allies").
- Anonymous1 decade ago
European countries have a long history of fighting each other and twice in the last century America has had to save them from themselves. The USA would win because we wouldn't even have to fight Europe. All we have to do to see Europe defeated is leave Europe alone and not save them next time.
- tobcolLv 51 decade ago
USA hands down. when was the last time they one a war without the USA's help? The French wouldn't even fight, the italians are becoming like the french. The Spaniards haven't even fought a war since the early 20th century. Swiss, they don't have an army...etc.etc.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 44 years ago
US has higher and badder military? you actually favor to finish a touch homework. France per chance a quiet united states of america yet theyre armed to the tooth with a really great army and nuclear arsenal with different delivery strategies. Americas journey of warfare isn't some thing and also you may hardly ever say they were successfull? uk and France have 5-7x extra military journey than u . s . and as Canada is a commonwealth united states of america its likely they'd decrease back Britain so u.s. would even ought to guard its land borders plus wide hate South u.s. has for u . s . its likely Theyd ought to guard Southern borders too. it is going to ensue yet will be over in months both with u . s . unconditional renounce it really is unlike or them launching chemical first they nevertheless have worlds best stockpile which makes their Syria argument extra pathetic, then organic and organic and finally nuclear strikes wiping actually everyone out truly than admit finished defeat. Itll ensue at the same time as American admits their GM infested foodstuff is poisonous.
- sjsosullivanLv 51 decade ago
One nation against many... Statistically, it would be Europe. But, you also need to address venue of combat, and circumstances. Being that we are allied via NATO, this is more than a little far-fetched.
- Debra HLv 71 decade ago
Lets not even go there.... i don't think Bush has infuriated Europe to that point yet... they just don't like us much.. but not enough to go to war with us....or did I miss the morning news????
- Anonymous1 decade ago
The believer's because it will eventually get worse & worse anyway. Look into the prisons here in US profiting off inmates working.