Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is a 2.2Ghz Dual Core processor really 3.7Ghz?

For computer techs: do you actually feel a 2.2Ghz dual core should be sold as a 3.7Ghz computer? Or a 2.4 D.C. be sold as a 4.45Ghz?

(2.2G DC with run 2 threats of info at 2.2 each - but there are actually graphics programs and games that need a patch or the DC will actually run them too slow)

Personally thinking this is flat out false advertisement and would like other's thoughts. Thanks

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Hmmm, under what sort of rules can you describe a 2.2 GHz processor as 3.7GHz? You can describe it as having performance in some circumstances that matches some mythical 3.7GHz processor... like Athlon's rating (= mythical K7 running at said speed... or was it a K6? Whatever, anyone ever seen a 3.2GHz Pentium?)

    To say that a dual-core 2.2 is a 3.7 is BS. It's only got a throughput equivalent if it's running a perfectly load-sharing application.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    I think it's labeled correctly.

    I sometimes split out the processors, so that one is dedicated to a given program (like SQL). The other processor is left for all other programs. In this case, I get a 2.2 processor, and another 2.2 processor.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.