Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Iran's leader proposes talks with Bush?

This is now the second time this request has been made.

Do you think that Bush can handle any debate thrown at him or will he duck this opportunity to prove that he is a competent or incompetent statesman?

Update:

Boldtruth07 - you stated at the end of your answer..."too bad, YOU aren't." If you bothered to read the question I have not taken a position. I posted the question to hear other Americans position. Yet you are the only person that assumed my position. Had no idea you were a min reader.

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    GREAT LINKS BELOW THAT DISPELL SOME OF THE HYPE CONCERNING U.S. And IRAN face Off.

    Countries need reasons to go to war and striking fear into the hearts of it's citizens has been a popular propaganda tool for ages. So right now we are being lead to believe that if Iran is building power plants than it is for the ultimate agenda of building nuclear arms. And we are to assume that they will use them. But think about it, Iran would get obliterated if they ever sent one up. It would be immediate suicide for them as the U.S. has 10,000 + nukes in it's arsenal and Israel even has several even though under the middle east treaty Israel is Not suppose to have any.

    Look for example How at the so called “Nut Job” Leader of North Korea. The media talks about what a lunatic the leader of North Korea is. But wait a minute this "nut " has nukes but wait... He hasn't attacked. Of course not, He knows it would be suicide for his country. But he also knows that having one is a great deterrent from anyone invading his country.

    When you consider human rights issues The North Korea leader doesn't care..He is a much bigger nut than Ahmadinejad who has actually sought meetings with President Bush only to be denied and kept at more than arms length. Ahmadinejad's diplomacy is making western governments look bad.

    But in order to position for the next offensive, we have to continue with name calling, labeling and assumptions of what Iran is "going to do".

    So that if we hear it long enough it must be true.

    But , naturally it starts to become very easy to see through the smoke screen. Iran’s leader, handled the British Soldier situation in an extremely civil manner on the world stage.

    Of course, this was too much for the U.K and U.S. to handle so of course we have to say how horribly treated the soldier’s were and how they were coerced. ..even though the soldier’s are showed snacking out and even smiling shortly after their capture. The soldier’s were very apologetic and suffered no physical harm.

    If the soldier's had so much as a bruise, the westerne media would have been displaying images night and day. But instead the U.K. just responded with a story, no documentation. This is all part of the setup to villianize a nation to strike fear in the hearts of the people so the masses think “we have to get them”

    Also Ahmadinejad never said that Israel should be wiped off the map either. But yet, that is the story we were told by our controlled media sources. Many scholars who are fluent in farsi attest to the fact that the meaning referrred to a complete change in Israel's administration. see the following link.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vie...

    AND GET THIS:

    Ahmadinejad visited the United States back in Sept of 2006 and met with a large group of rabbis and yet not one word about the visit on the nightly news.

    see image in this link....ask yourself " how could this be ?"

    http://www.foxnews.com/images/247825/0_62_122606_r...

    anyway, politicians and governments have to sell the story..."sadaam has weapons of mass destruction" creates fear... Now we have to go get him...But we couldn't find the weapons...

    Now it’s time to villianize Iran... to set up the next stage of the operation. I pray not.

    Iran needs a good deterrent.

    meanwhile,check out this well made documentary discussing the legality of this war.

    Great comments by current and retired military personnel. This is important especially for those of us who have served or who are serving and also those of you with children as someday we may see a draft reinstated and we should all be clear on what we are fighting for.

    Democrats and Repubs should lay down party politics and get serious about doing the right thing so that the country’s citizens and the country’s soldiers are not put in harms way unnecessarily.Very well made documentary and a little hard to want to face.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlcpXBFOXA

    this link shows one of a 10 part documentary.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    What approximately Iraq? One war at a time. it is from McCain's website: "John McCain believes it incredibly is strategically and morally necessary for the U. S. to help the government of Iraq to alter into able to governing itself and safeguarding its human beings. He strongly disagrees with people who recommend taking flight American troops in the previous that has got here approximately." On Iran, McCain's website says: "the U. S. could additionally bolster its interior of reach defense force posture to make sparkling to Iran our decision to guard our forces and deter Iranian intervention." McCain is a war hero and he believes that use of the defense force is the only answer. He would not comprehend that throughout 2008 it incredibly is money particularly than defense force might desire to that determines power. we are dropping our side in the two areas and it's time to regroup in the previous we've not have been given any defense force or money.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Bush has a cowboy mentality of shoot first and ask questions later. He has no desire to negtotiate. He didn't really want to negotiate with Saddam Hussein but was forced to wait by the UN and others. Bush is a war monger and always has been.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He will find some way to avoid it again. He can't handle a speech to this nation without flubbing it up so there is no way he can do this competently!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    It's like Obama said - we have lost respect in the world and no longer are perceived as leaders of the free world thanks to GW Bonehead. Of course he'll avoid open debate.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There is no debate here. The UN has told Iran what they need to do. Why should we talk to a terrorist? Are people that damned stupid to fall for this crap?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Bush can't spell diplomacy, much less say it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    israel does not allow him to talk

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    AIPAC won't let him

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.