Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Why do cons continue to deny the scientific consensus on man made global warming?

Better yet, why do they think editorials from political websites, youtube videos, and cut and paste from a wikipedia article of individual scientists against the (((MAINSTREAM))) assesment on global warming has more credibility

than

my list of well established scientific organizations, each representing tens of thousands of scientists?

SHORT SUMMARY LIST

1) THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, FOUNDED IN 1876, OVER 160,000 MEMBERS

"There is now general agreement among scientific experts that the recent warming trend is real (and particularly strong within the past 20 years), that most of the observed warming is likely due to increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, and that climate change could have serious adverse effects by the end of this century."

http://www.chemistry.org/portal/resources/ACS/ACSC...

Update:

2) THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, FOUNDED IN 1888, OVER 20,500 MEMBERS

"The Geological Society of America (GSA) supports the scientific conclusions that Earth’s climate is changing; the climate changes are due in part to human activities; and the probable consequences of the climate changes will be significant and blind to geopolitical boundaries.

http://www.geosociety.org/aboutus/position10.htm

3) THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGY SOCIETY, FOUNDED IN 1919, OVER 11,000 MEMBERS

"Despite the uncertainties noted above, there is adequate evidence from observations and interpretations of climate simulations to conclude that the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; that humans have significantly contributed to this change; and that further climate change will continue to have important impacts on human societies, on economies, on ecosystems, and on wildlife through the 21st century and beyond."

http://www.ametsoc.org/POLICY/2007climatechange.ht...

Update 2:

4) THE U.S. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE (ALONG WITH THE NAS OF THE G8 NATIONS), FOUNDED IN 1863, OVER 2,000 MEMBERS, OVER 200 NOBEL PRIZE MEMBERS

"There is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities. The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action.

http://www.academie-sciences.fr/actualites/textes/...

5) THE AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, FOUNDED IN 1919, OVER 45,000 MEMBERS

"Human activities are increasingly altering the Earth's climate. These effects add to natural influences that have been present over Earth's history. Scientific evidence strongly indicates that natural influences cannot explain the rapid increase in global near-surface temperatures observed during the second half of the 20th century.

http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_p...

Update 3:

6) THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, CREATED IN 1988, HUNDREDS OF SCIENTISTS FROM OVER 130 NATIONS

"Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (defined in footnotes as greater then 90% likelyhood) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns"

http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

Update 4:

7) THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, FOUNDED IN 1848, SERVES 262 AFFILIATED SOCIETIES AND ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE FOR A TOTAL OF 10 MILLION INDIVIDUALS

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now."

http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change...

Update 5:

8) THE NOAA'S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER PALEOCLIMATOLOGY PROGRAM, FOUNDED IN 1992, HAS THE LARGEST ARCHIVE OF CLIMATE AND PALEOCLIMATE DATA

"Many scientists have now concluded that global warming can be explained by a human-caused enhancement of the greenhouse effect. It is important to remember both that the greenhouse effect occurs naturally, and that it has been intensified by humankind's input of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere."

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/what....

Update 6:

9) THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, FOUNDED IN 1960, OVER 120 MEMBERS, SERVES OVER 62 PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS INCLUDING UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH CENTERS

"Together, these data show that Earth's surface air temperature has risen more than 1.1°F (0.7°C) since the late 1800s. This warming of the average temperature around the globe has been especially sharp since the 1970s. Global models at NCAR have simulated 20th century climate and found three main factors at work:

1) Solar activity contributed to a warming trend in global average temperature from the 1910s through 1930s.

2) As industrial activity increased following World War II, sun-blocking sulfates and other aerosol emissions helped lead to a slight global cooling from the 1940s to 1970s.

3) Since 1980, the rise in greenhouse gas emissions from human activity has overwhelmed the aerosol effect to produce overall global warming."

http://www.ucar.edu/research/climate/warming.jsp

Update 7:

10) THE NASA'S GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES, FOUNDED IN 1961, SPECIALIZES IN SPACECRAFT OBSERVATIONS AND GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS

"A new NASA-funded study used a computer climate model to simulate the last 50 years of climate changes, projects warming over the next 50 years regardless of whether or not nations curb their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions soon. If no emission reductions are made and they continue to increase at the current rate, global temperatures may increase by 1-2º Celsius (1.8º-3.6º Fahrenheit). But if the growth rate of carbon dioxide does not exceed its current rate and if the growth of true air pollutants (things that are harmful to human health) is reversed, temperatures may rise by only 0.75C (1.35F)."

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20020919/

Update 8:

"They are all funded by government grants."

You mean like the PRIVATE scientific organizations that I listed that are actually funded by member dues?

"The media can sell anything to a liberal like you. Get the facts from independent non-government sources."

You mean from right-wing political websites like the CATO institute right?

Update 9:

annie,

These aren't my opinions. They are the OFFICIAL STATEMENTS on man made global warming from well established scientific organizations engaged in climatic, geologic, and meteorologic research.

I went out of my way to gather these statements and to educate the yahoo public.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because dealing with man made global warming will hit many of then in the wallet.

  • 1 decade ago

    Personally, I don't care if it's human caused or not. This planet is still polluted - or is everyone comfortable with drinking tap water?

    How about brown clouds of pollution over urban areas?

    I'm sure the oceans are as pristine as ever as are the lakes?

    And yes, of course, fossil fuels have an indefinite supply, which is precisely why prices have continuously gone up.

    Everyone misses the point that whether global warming (which will result in eventual cooling) is undisputed. Period. The question is whether or not the people who do the various types of polluting are willing to make a change.

    It is obvious by the politicians in their pockets that they are not. So do what you can individually.

    Source(s): I drive a LEV, have CFL bulbs, recycle and carpool. Every little bit helps.
  • 1 decade ago

    how do you explain this then?

    http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p357.htm

    petition has over over 17200 signers at last note, these are all scientists and all stating they dont buy it.

    Just because you have someone thats a member of the geological survey for example doesnt mean that every member of the geological survey believes that. So you can count how many members an organization has but that doesnt mean much.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    RAO123 hit it on the hammer.

    Trying to do anything about global warming takes a little out of the pockets of the big businesses that finance their politicians' campaigns. So they complain about it, and next thing you know, their worshipful talk radio is saying it's lies spread by the liberal media. And conservative talk radio is NEVER, EVER, EVER wrong.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    It's common sense and history. This happened many many years ago. Just because some liberal scientists say it's global warming, do we all have to jump on the green band wagon? No. It's called common sense and not being a tree hugging lunatic.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Did you know that this question has been asked before. I highly doubt you are actually asking a question rather you are stating your political opinion, which this is the wrong place... Its not called "yahoo political opinion" get a life and go plant a tree if you are so worried about global warming. whats your carbon foot print. are you doing anything about that instead of complaining on the Internet? Probablly not.

  • 1 decade ago

    They are all funded by government grants. The media can sell anything to a liberal like you. Get the facts from independent non-government sources

  • 1 decade ago

    What happened to global cooling. They were off on a delirious rant about that too 30 years ago.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I just contributed to global warming.....no more beans for dinner!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    they were too lazy to study math in science in school, but now they want to be arm chair scientists

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.