Soldiers not Protected?

Question

Three U.S. soldiers slaughtered in a grisly kidnapping-murder plot south of Baghdad last June were not properly protected during a mission that was not well planned or executed, a military investigation has concluded.
Is this a neocons idea of "Support Our Troops"?
A moment of silence for these brave US soldiers that were slaughtered in the name of Corporate greed and a Corrupt Administration that sent them to an illegal invasion.

tiny Valkyrie · Accepted Answer

Absolutely.... Their deaths ensure the Bushite buddies' profits keep rolling in.  They are merely a diversion to keep the insurgents from attacking Haliburton's workers while they suck oil out of the ground, and KBR who charges $100 per load of the troops laundry, washed in contaminated water mind you.

DeuceRider · Answer

Since when do libs like you care about the troops? tell that to Pelosi and Reid who want to defund the troops or better yet tell it to Clinton who cut military spending. Libs

Anonymous · Answer

It is amazing to me, complacency and lack of training are the norm now.  If you do not train a soldier properly and send that soldier into combat conditions, aren't you sending them to die?

Anonymous · Answer

People die in wars, and after the shooting start even the best made plans tend to fall apart.

I just love the way people give me "thumbs down" when I don't agree with the line of thinking that the questioner has.

Time to Shrug, Atlas · Answer

So Enron and George Bush are to blame for ground level officers not properly planning one specific mission?

You guys amaze me.

Anonymous · Answer

Actually the Democrats gave away their position.

Trending News

Soldiers not Protected?

4 Answers