Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

darth_logical asked in SportsMartial Arts · 1 decade ago

Why do people feel the need to go out of their way to criticize TaeKwonDo?

Ok, we all understand. If I'm in a real fight, I'm not going to try to knock the person down with a fancy 360 inside crescent kick.

But, in my decade or so of Taekwondo training, I learned many, many other techniques (joint-locks, arm-breaks, punches, elbows, etc) which would be effective in that situation.

I can only assume people are looking at sport taekwondo and then stereotyping an entire martial art discipline by what they see there. I'm sorry, but watching fights on TV does NOT make you an expert in judging whether one is always completely effective against another.

I understand that there are a huge number of TKD schools across the nation, and sadly, many of them are indeed belt factories, but don't write off an ancient, efficient, and deadly martial art just because of that.

PS: I'm not looking for polemics, "because it sucks" is not an answer, it's a commentary on the intelligence of the answerer.

Update:

Perhaps surprisingly after having taken it for so long, I had not seen sport Taekwondo until recently. I thought it looked pretty ridiculous, nothing like what we learned.

Update 2:

necroth:

While I wouldn't ever lead with it, that 360 inside crescent makes an awesome finishing move. ;)

I'm being somewhat facetious there, but learning and perfecting a technique like that does help you improve balance, speed, etc.

And, there is much more to a martial art than simply learning the most effective ways to injure someone...

25 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    There are several aspects to my answer:

    #1. People knock TKD because they simply do not know enough about the art. It's human nature to make fun or cut down something they don't understand, whether it's politics, fashion, religion, or sports. Think of male ballet dancers and how much ribbing they get about the tights and twirling around. But the regimen and training a male dancer goes through? You don't want to mess with the strength in those legs or in those arms, the ones that continually lift female dancers with ease.

    The UFC has not done TKD (or any traditional art) any favors. People see these guys pound each other and then wonder about the guy in the dobok bouncing around and throwing kicks.

    So why do people knock TKD? Ignorance.

    #2. I was a 1st degree black belt when I was actually called to use my skills to defend myself against an out-of-control 6'3" male (I'm a 5'6" female). Anyone who knows TKD knows that the blocks, kicks, and strikes can be devastating... BUT also knows that we believe that TKD is the last possible defense and that we strike to disable, not to maim. When my attacker went to trial, his charlatan of an attorney painted this ridiculous picture of me as a female Jackie Chan, breaking walls with my pinkie (seriously -- it's in the court transcripts) and being a dangerous thug because I had a number of sparring trophies under my belt, so to speak. Were there any martial artists on the jury? No. If there had been, they would have understood the tenets of control and self discipline and known that I used my TKD as a last resort. My attacker was found not guilty. Me? I bear the physical scars of his attack to this day (albeit under make up).

    If people truly understood TKD, they would have understood its power and its discipline. Again, ignorance, but from a different angle.

    #3. Too many TKD schools are around that exist almsot solely to line the owners' pockets. Charge for the uniform, charge a registration fee, charge for each piece of equipment, charge a monthly processing fee, charge exorbitantly for each test, charge for "mandatory" seminars, charge for testing review classes, etc. Yet the quality of student they turn out? Couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag. And this is what people see. Case in point: one of the country's largest TKD schools is located in my town. Students are tested every 3 months, regardless of whether they are ready or not. The school's focus? Self esteem. Not skills, not self defense, not sparring. Self esteem. Well, one little 8 year old Black Belt's self esteem got knocked to the ground when he was standing outside the dojang in his black belt uniform, waiting to be picked up, and a trio of 7 year olds took him on and sent him running back to his instructor crying, with a bloody nose.

    We've had students from this school and from other TKD schools come to us, some at intermediate ranks, some one or two ranks away from Black Belt. When we evaluate them for placement, every single one has been a white belt. No skills, no technique, no retention. We have also lost students (juniors) because they'd been with us for a year and hadn't advanced in rank yet. Well, we don't hand out rank unless it has been earned. If it takes five months, great! If it takes longer, well, then it takes longer. But we believe in teaching our art correctly and responsibly.

    So again, ignorance, perpetuated by "belt factories" that care more about money than about sharing the art, so that TKD "black belts" that fight like wet noodles and have no discipline are out there, giving TKD a bad name

    Source(s): Owner of a TKD school
  • 1 decade ago

    I trained TKD for a little while when I was younger, and to be 100% honest not one thing I was taught was in any way practical. We learned techniques and mostly forms, mild weapon training and some light sparring, but in the end I did not feel at all like a better fighter than when I began.

    It is sad to say, but TKD schools in America are either a belt factory or sport. I have seen a few sport TKD matches where both combatants stood there hopping foot to foot with their hands DOWN AT THEIR SIDES, then traded kicks with out once guarding their face! Not... necessarily what you want to do if you like to be conscious @_@

    Then I saw an exhibition match between a Muay Thai school vs a TKD school. To say the Muay Thai school dominated would be an understatement. I am not a mean spirited person, I actually felt bad for the TKD guys because it looked very embarrassing. Talking to them after wards, they each pretty much had the same things to say: "I didn't know how to defend his attacks" "I couldn't hit him when he got close" "My kicks didn't look like they bothered him"

    I won't fully discredit TKD, because UFC fighters David Loiseau and George St. Pierre both trained for a long time and have incorporated it into their MMA game (spinning back kicks most notably). Sport TKD though..... I'm sorry but it is a joke.

  • 1 decade ago

    I don't have a answer like the others. Talking about whats wrong with TKD.

    But I am a TKD master instructor and my view on it is simply the public not under standing the art or the sport. The sport fighters are athletes just like all other fight sports. If people would try it from a good school they may like it and under stand it more. I have also been to some really bad Karate, Ju-jitsu dojos , and a few bad MMA and kickboxing gyms.

    so its not just TKD that is like that.

    I have cross trained in other styles and have taken the techs that work for me and have combined them with my TKD techs. any body who is a practitioner of MA knows that flashy doesn't work in a real fight, no matter what style.

    every body wants to say MMA (kickboxing, BJJ, ext.) is so much better. the only way to do that is cross train. TKD is only one style not every style in one of course it has flaws and so does other arts.

    And just to touch on the sport part a little more. yeah some of its flashy but it works. we hit each other with gear on and still knock each other out. oh yeah and the reason punching isn't exploited in sport is because any body can knock out some body with their hands not every one can do it with their feet. we react faster than most other styles with our counters and such because of the pace that we move at. if a sport TKD player was in a real fight they should do all right for the fact that we are used to getting hit hard and moving/countering faster than our opponent.

    and if thats not good enough then why do most styles use TKD kicks as their leg techniques. and foot work.

    Well thats my opinion on this topic and every art is left up to its students/practitioners to show how it work and looks.

  • 1 decade ago

    I've come across the stereotype that TKD is not a "real" martial art several times over the years. Personally, I think it says more about the martial artist making the accusation than about the art itself. Any style has the potential to be practiced with sincerity and integrity, or just so you can say you have some pretty colored belts. Just because I meet some 16 year old kid who says, "I could beat you up! I study ninjitsu! I know the art of the ninja!" it doesn't take anything away from ninjitsu itself.

    I say, judge the martial artist, not the art!

    Source(s): 10 years TKD practice
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • JAS
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    you're right, most people when criticizing TKD are criticizing sport TKD. I am guilty of this myself, but when talking about the way that they teach it in Korea is entirely different and is to be respected.

    Many schools, not just TKD schools, see martial arts as money makers and teach it to look pretty and go just for sport. and when a student from that school brags about how they're a 3rd degree BB because, gets in a fight and loses(badly) it looks bad on that particular MA and school. Some people don't understand that what they learn isn't to be applied in the streets. And to me, the school is responsible for the student understanding that.

    I have changed my opinion of TKD a lot and i realize that most of the times, you should look at the practitioner rather than the style of MA. I view TKD like i do any other art now. I look to see how that style is taught and what seems to be more important to the school...money or quality. That's why when i talk to a person now about TKD i make sure i criticize the school (usually ATA) rather than the particular style of martial art.

    Source(s): 10 years in martial arts
  • 1 decade ago

    I think you answered your own question there. People only know a little bit about it, and the little bit that gets advertised is not flattering. I honestly don't know that much about it, but it seems like any other martial art - there's a broad range of skills, some showy and pretty much useless and some are highly effective. In public type fights, showiness is almost as important as winning (that's true of all styles though) because you're trying to impress the public.

    Still, that showiness combined with the number of money-hungry teachers and the fact that martial artists can sometimes be a bit derogatory to other disciplines and then pass that attitude along to their students and friends, and it's just got a bad rep. It it helps, I reccommend people avoid TKD because I don't know of any reputable teachers in the area, not because I don't respect the art.

    Source(s): my discipline's got a rep as a bunch of savage meatheads, so I feel your pain
  • JV
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    I think a lot of them just jumped on the band wagon. They probably have read what someone else has said about TKD and based an opinion on that alone.

    I have never studied TKD, but I know many people who are TKD fighters. Yes, FIGHTERS! Mr. Chadwyl Barnes, former PKA fighter and President of Showdown Productions and the World Karate Organization, based in Southern California is just one of them. He operates a school where TKD fighters train to compete in Kickboxing, Grappling, MMA and Sport Karate - All full contact fighting forms. Many of his students have won California State Title Belts and some have won World Title Belts.

    You see, there is a big problem when TKD detractors wield the broad brush. It just shows that they are lazy and don't want to take the time to get the facts before opening their mouths.

    Source(s): I am a retired pro Muay Thai fighter who fought for the International Kickboxing Association (IKBA) Light Heavyweight World Title in 1981. Now I am a Ring Announcer for MMA, Kickboxing, Grappling, Boxing and Karate events in Southern California.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Like everyone else said, you are on to something. "Shopping Mall Belt Factories". I did TKD for a little while. I learned more practical fighting in a week of Muay Thai than a year of TKD. And you can't write off what you see on TV. There is a reason why TKD black belts get their butts handed to them at MMA tournaments. When I fought, it was hard finding MMA tournaments because TKD owns the US martial arts market and a lot of times they refuse to fight in MMA tournaments. So you see a lot of TKD tournaments instead. With all of these TKD schools pumping out black belts like NFL is pumping out criminals, sole blame for this stereotype lies directly on the TKD schools themselves. Look at UFC, you may not like it but it's practically street fighting (especially before Congress made them get some rules). The vast majority of those fighters know Thai boxing, wrestling, or brazilian ju jitsu. I'm not trying to be one of these "TKD sucks" bandwagon guys, but do the math. I'm not saying you can't fight, but TKD is the laughing stock of the martial arts world. Take it from someone who has been on both sides of the coin.

  • 1 decade ago

    I just read the headline, what else do I need to read.

    Tkd, in my view, and in alot of peoples view just is plain and simply not effective and is only good for sport and flashy b.s. By the way I wouldn't go out of my way to down the art. I shouldn't belittle any art I know that. I do voice my view, and as I have said forever, man I'm old, TKD is and always will be the last art on Earth, or any other planet on my list of things to learn. In fact I am fond of saying I'd rather have a sharp stick in the eye before training in TKD. I know this is not right of me, I will say that. I shouldn't down any art. In that respect I am wrong. But never less I do believe what I say is true, so how bad can it truly be. Disagree or Agree for me I am right, for you I may be wrong. I am sure you do not agree with me on how effective my styles are. In so you have every right to disagree as strongly as you wanted. All I can say is that I have fought, I mean a real fight, TKD students and seen many fight. From xp, TKD is truely not even on my list of arts I'd do, for any reason. I personally see no truth in Tkd, but don't feel bad I don't see much truth in any "traditional" martial art.

  • 1 decade ago

    The same reason some people Write Off Judo because of seeing Olympic Judo. It gives your art a bad name. Now no art is inherantly bad. If you have never learned how to fight and you take even Sport Tae kwon Do your gonna get better. But it all comes back to what the art is today and how much of it really works. Today Tae Kwon Do is a Sport and 75% of what is taught doesn't work on the street.

    Even In Korea where it was invented people train in Hapkido for Self Defence and Tae Kwno Do for Sport now.(for the Most part)

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.