A born "human-chimera", hybrid of human, orange uttan (kinda monkey), & a chimp: isn't it a prove of evolution

It is called cross breeding and genetic manipulation. It proves nothing of evolution.

No, of course not! We may have similar enough DNA for a mouse to grow a human's brain, but the question is: Did the mouse survive as a normally functioning mouse and live its regular life span (or even close to it)? If he didn't, then what was created was a MUTANT, not a hybrid. In other words an unnatural (meaning "against the basic laws of nature") creation. And the mutant will almost assuredly die, proving that it was against "natural" law for it to exist.

As far as the hybrid chimera/human... the same basic question applies. I can take a staph infection and breed it on a monkey or a mouse and kill it. That doesn't mean I've successfully bred a staphmonkey. Or a staphmouse.

As creatures who all live here on planet earth it's no surprise we are similar. But that doesn't mean we're the same, and designed to cross breed. Breeding across species is almost never good.

And this supposed human-chimera does not in any way prove that we and apes have the same ancestor. Show me the whole skeletons of the "tribes" or "clans" of ape-people that lived before. Not just one or two random supposed skeletons (or mostly partial skeletons) that are supposed to be representative of whole entire epochs! Then I might be able to believe it.

Besides, the smartest monkey I've ever seen was at the zoo here in my state. She was bright and inquisitive. But still every inch an ape - by which I mean, that although she was bright, she was still nowhere near as intelligent as people. How do I know? Have you ever seen an ape read (or write) a book on astronomy? Build an airplane? Build a car? Perform open heart surgery? I am not trying to be mean here. I love apes and monkeys. And I am not being arrogant when I say they simply are not as smart as humans.

If we "evolved" from apes, why do apes still exist? If survival of the fittest were true, where is the progress of the species. By that logic, apes should've died out and all that's here is us. No apes at all. But it's not that way.

I would be interested in hearing more about this supposed human chimera. And not at all surprised to find out it's a hoax, or else why isn't it global news?

I'm sorry, but I honestly can not buy any of this as arguments for evolution.

There are chimeras in many species (I raise some African violet chimeral plants - they're very popular amongst enthusiasts). However, I don't know of any inter-species chimeras except in mythology. Unless your prof can provide a paper and its citation in a recognized journal, I'd be very much inclined to think he made this up.

A chimera requires two individuals (with a diploid number of chromosomes - NOT "germ" cells) with the same number of chromosomes. Humans have 46, chimps have 48, so I'd say he's full of it.

And for the record: I believe in God, AND in evolution.

As much proof as the human ear growing on the back of a rodent.

Watch this video please:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-681404859...

No it isn't enough. We do not have the same ancestor. We have the same creator. There is a different. Evolution is possible, but not in the way you suggest.

No that just proves were pretty good and messing with creatures DNA.

yes and my cousing constructed a miniature universe in his bathtube. This must be proof of something.

It isn't "enough" proof, no, because there is no proof of it. Proof of evolution? Oh please.

no