Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

At MoneyMakers request. What is the difference between Legal Occupation & illegal occupation?

Israeli Occupation

Israeli Occupation of the Palestinian Territory

In the course of the armed conflict that erupted in the Middle East in June 1967, the Israeli military occupied the remainder of Mandated Palestine:

Following the war, the UN Security Council adopted resolution 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, which emphasized the international law principle of "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" and which affirmed that peace in the Middle East should be based on the "withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict" and the "termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

This resolution, along with the principle of returning the land in exchange for peace (land for peace) which was embodied in it, became the basis for the Middle East peace process.

Based on the fundamental principles of the Charter of the United Nations, international law and relevant UN resolutions, the entire international community considers the Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, along with the other Arab territories occupied by Israel in 1967, to be "occupied territories" subject to the 4th Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949 relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Times of War. The United Nations, in a multitude of resolutions, has affirmed the applicability of the 4th Geneva Convention to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967, including East Jerusalem and has called for an end to the occupation. The UN has also repeatedly affirmed the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and the need for the realization of those rights.

At the start of the occupation, Israel, the occupying Power, immediately began imposing scores of repressive measures against the Palestinian civilian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. These measures, entailing grave violations of human rights, have inflicted enormous suffering and harm on the Palestinian civilian population. At the same time, the occupying Power attempted to change the status of the occupied territory or parts of it and to change the demographic composition of the territory through the illegal transfer of Israeli civilians. The occupying Power attempted to justify many of these measures by citing its security considerations or military needs. In reality, however, the occupying Power has been driven by an expansionist vision or ideology and, in the course of implementing such a vision, has used its enormous military capabilities and a complex system of economic, legal and administrative policies and practices.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    There is no legal or illegal. There is only right or wrong. Is israel's 60 years of occupation right or wrong?

    If a man is good, his deeds bear fruit and his presence brings harmony and contentment. If a man is evil his name and his acts are despised. As he travels through life, he must hide his identity and motives; and he will deny his own works.

    So now look at the history of the modern state of israel. Ask yourself, is israel a good man, or an evil man.

  • 1 decade ago

    There isn't really much of any, and if there is, Israel's occupation is legal. The concept is land for peace; as there's no peace there's no land. If the Palestinians get their act together, elect a government that's moderate enough to come to the negotiation table and make a deal, then there will be both peace and land.

  • 1 decade ago

    "The occupying Power attempted to justify many of these measures by citing its security considerations or military needs."

    Have you ever bothered to actually read Resolution 242? Well, if you did, you'd see that it explicitly states that:

    "every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;"

    The liberation of the West Bank in 1967 is necessary for Israeli security, and hence, they are actually following the guidelines set by the resolution. Game over.

  • 1 decade ago

    Too long, too boring.

    Wars happen, land gets annexed by winners from losers.

    Deal with it.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.