Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
13 Answers
- BobLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
CO2. It's not a close call. Global warming threatens us with economic disaster coping with the effects.
http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL05...
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM6avr07.pdf
We know perfectly well how to bury waste safely. It's just a political problem to select a site. For just one example,
- 1 decade ago
Nuclear waste is not bad because their is still allot of room to put it. Eventually it will be a problem when we run out of room but that is still a good ways away, we just have to make sure it stays in a safe spot. CO2 is a bigger problem in my opinion, it wouldn't be that big a problem as long as people start being smart about getting better cars that don't burn off as much CO2. We need to start massing alternative energy sources like solar power.
Source(s): my brain - GABYLv 71 decade ago
CO2. Nuclear waste can and is contained for storage. There is plenty of almost uninhabital areas of the earth to store it. CO2 is killing us NOW. We could use Nuclear until new technologies could be devloped.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 3DMLv 51 decade ago
That all depends on where they happen to be. CO2 to a plant may seem like heaven, to the people living around Lake Nyos, certain death.
http://www.geo.arizona.edu/geo5xx/geos577/projects...
Nuclear waste can represent the realized potential of clean energy, or as further potential in a third or fourth generation reactor. A suitcase full of nuclear waste and C4 in the hands of a jihadist - horrific disaster.
But if I had to pick one, it would be nuclear fuel because there are no natural cycles to return it to its original state.
- 1 decade ago
nuclear waste...because it has more radioactive waste and is more toxic and difficult to dispose unlike CO2. This toxic wastes can contaminate air, soil, and groundwater which can greatly affect people and other living things around it.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas which contributes to the global warming, but it can be resolved by planting more trees and plants..we all know that CO2 is needed by the plants for photosynthesis as well as the sunlight and water.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
CO2
Nuclear waste is not a global problem, it is contained and localized to the specific site where it is held.
Source(s): GW "bubba" who worked 15 years in the nuclear industry, including, but not limited to, nuclear waste management and environmental protection. - Anonymous1 decade ago
Both. But the Global warming bubba's will say CO2.
Cheers!
- cosmicwindwalkerLv 61 decade ago
we have to start picking good alternatives instead of picking the least bad alternative.