Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

In a perfect world?

With socalized medicine and a government that doesn't waste money. If all countries had socalized medicine so doctors couldn't chose a country or state, but only practiced medicine to heal people...wouldn't it work? If there was no insurance and a price set for all pharmaceuticals. I know as American's we have power and money (as a country)...why not think of our own? Myself, I would prefer a doctor who wanted to help me and not just make money.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Doctors generally do want to help people, but they also have to pay the office payroll and the light bill.

    Pharma companies don't need as much profit margin as they have to produce new drugs, but there has to be some incentive.

    You've posted this question at a bad time for me; with a chunk of my staff on vacation, I've been pulling some ungodly hours, and I can testify that try as I might my altruism gets spread thin when I'm treating a 3-day-old boil at 3 a.m. in a patient that hasn't tried to pay even $5 on his previous 3 bills but got here in his $30,000 car. One of the charitable benchmarks is that the patient feel worse than the doctor. It shouldn't be, but that's human nature.

    Keep in mind that doctors are smarter and harder working than your average person. If they don't have some incentive to practice medicine, they can make more money for less work doing something else.

  • 1 decade ago

    My answer may be cynical at best.

    Let's go back in time to before the gross worship of the almighty dollar. My grandfather was the first president of the charter chapter of the AMA. When he was in practice, he turned NO ONE away. A chicken as payment was not unusual.

    It was only with the advent of receptionists well after his death that this started to occur. According to the Hippocratic Oath, no physician can turn away someone in need. Cleverly, their front office can. Nothing like a loop-hole in a capitalistic society.

    As for the cost of education and wanting a better life, don't get me started on the sorry pay for the teachers that inspire children to want to be doctors...

    I'm not quite sure if I really answered your question. I guess in an ideal world we would have affordable health care, affordable education, and a government that provided and encouraged both.

  • 1 decade ago

    I think that you are unfortunately forgetting the element of simple greed that is an elementary part of all human beings. People don't just "go into medicine to help others" -- they decide on a career path that will help them to become financially successful and socially prominent. Perhaps there are a very FEW who choose medicine as a career to "help others", but by the time they've had to pay the exhorbitant costs of an education plus all of the expenses and pressures of training, most all thoughts of taking on the enormous risks associated with practicing medicine are left on the wayside. In an ideal world we would still have very flawed human beings who want to have things their way--. so that world would no longer be perfect. Good thoughts and intentions, but very unrealistic.

    Source(s): I come from a family with several physicians in it....
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    if the doctor only helped the patients it means that the doctor will not rich until he or she die....

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    yes yes yes.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.