Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

New Evidence Clearly Indicates Pat Tillman Was Executed?

This should be the top story today. I guess the military industrial complex does own our media.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/military/tillman_...

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    It is conspiracy against military

  • John T
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Wow, this is the first time I've actually looked at that webpage. It is very enlightening.

    Usually, I rant and rave at the indiscretions of the media for leaving out key information to imply false conclusions and for selectively editing and reporting to achieve their political and financial agendas.

    Usually, I suggest that conspiracy theorists should take up script writing for Hollywood.

    But this isn't even a good script. It isn't even a well-researched script. It is bestraught with easily identifiable flaws. I cannot see how even a civilian would believe it.

    It isn't even close to accurate. It provides NO support for its statements. Even CNN is more precise and objective.

    So, Tillman was supposedly going to use his experience in war to protest the "illegal War in Iraq?" This completely ignores the fact that he wasn't in Iraq. He was in Afghanistan. Who is making the statement that he had contacted war protestors? The war protestors? The authors of the obviously misleading article?

    Pat Tillman was an honorable American and an honorable soldier. I've met soldiers that trained with him and they remarked about how he avoided the spotlight, was quiet and attempted to hide his superstar status.

    Regardless of what weapon held by what side fired the weapon has no effect on the honor or bravery of his service. The military is not going to shout from the rooftops that one of its own fell in a friendly fire incident. They are not going to make such a determination that he was killed by a 'friendly' bullet without first investigating it. And no, they aren't going to revoke a medal that he earned because of it.

    If *you* ever find yourself in a battlefield, I expect you'll have brown and yellow stained pants under whatever rock you can find to hide. But if *you* somehow find the nuts to peak out from the rock, you'll find yourself confused as to who or what is happening.

  • 1 decade ago

    What happened to Tillman is sad. He was a national hero. Give me one sound reason why we would exacute a highly trained Army Ranger. There is none. You have never served so I dont expect you to know about the fog of war. Tillman was killed in a friendly fire incident and Rangers like all infantry are good shots. That anti American website is full of crap. He was not exacuted but some general did decide to cover it up, why should reduce them to the rank of PVT.

    Source(s): SGT US Army
  • 1 decade ago

    Yeah the evidence is troubling. Rangers are good shots and it appears that there was a good grouping of forehead shots.

    But we also have to be rationale about the evidence. It appears that Tillman and a squadmate were lying down and under fire (from friendlies). Tillman's wounds are consistent with a guy lying down and looking up to see what's up and bam...Ranger hits him with a single burst.

    So we still don't necessarily have the entire truth of what occurred. But it's coming.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    It was already released. The AP printed that and other information early this morning about the Pat Tillman investigation. There's no conspiray to hide these details from the media. You're behind the power curve.

    AP: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070727/ap_on_re_us/ti...

    ABC:

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=3419299

    USA Today:

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-07-26-til...

  • 1 decade ago

    what ever the outcome I think it is a huge shame this man [like them ALL] has died............I think that perhaps for many others it is even harder to swallow that he appears to have been slain under the heading of friendly fire................perhaps the most hardest of any loss to take.

    I hope they do not try to single out the one person or persons and make an example of them..what would that serve..certainly will not give the world back this man or any of the others that have died under this flag of friendly fire.

    regards

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    So the army is accusing itself of a conspiracy against itself?

    wow, that is some cool spin right there

    I think only people who have never been in the military could come up with this stuff.

  • 1 decade ago

    You are an IDIOT. People stupid enough to believe this, or the 9/11 conspiracy theories, should be screened out of the gene pool.

    Yes, copy and paste gets me 2 points with less work.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    infowars as a source???

    I put them just a realiable as National Equirer.

    Come back when you have real source.

    Friendly fire is not a joke and those rangers are sick about it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Ah yes, the conspiracy theory de jour...give this one up and go back to finding who REALLY killed JFK

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.