Why do they have Khali vs. Mr. Steroids when Mark Henry would make a much more intriguing match?

WWE has never really backed Mark Henry to much, and I never seen him get anywhere near the title, while Bistia has held it before and is way more tone then Mark Henry is, but I do think Kane vs Khali will be better, but right now I think they're going to have people job for Khali, so when Rey beats him for the title, (Rey always gets to big of a push and unearned title shots when his friends die) it'll make Rey look like a buyable champion for beating someone no one else (But Taker and Cena) have been able to beat.

Why have a heel vs heel match? Go ahead let Batista win the title at SummerSlam. Then Henry can go after the title , hopefully win it. Thus leading up to a Undertaker/Henry Match for the Title , till Edge comes back anyways.

So true if Batista wins the title I will only watch raw

cause mark henrys a fat azz and kane would be a better match.

yes thats what i have been wanting to see most on smackdown

he dont use steriods