Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Evolutionists: Question for you?
take a look at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_sc/human...
If evolution was proven false by this research, would you still cling to the evolution THEORY? If not, what would you believe in?
17 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
That's good for a pushup. What are we up to now?
-------------------------
9? Okay, three more pushups for me, then.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
It looks like you are one of those ever so intelligent creationists who are not capable of reading an entire article other than the headline.
Try taking a look at this exerpt from that article:
Susan Anton, a New York University anthropologist and co-author of the Leakey work, said she expects anti-evolution proponents to seize on the new research, but said it would be a mistake to try to use the new work to show flaws in evolution theory.
"This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points," Anton said. "This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continous self-testing process."
*GULP*
- nobodinozeLv 51 decade ago
Evolution wasn't in any manner proven false by that research.Did you even bother to read it?Simply shows two ancestors lived side by side,instead of one after the other.I am quite positive the future will hold discoveries of still more hominid fossils,some will push certain dates back,some may change the actual lineage.Isn't science at its best,putting theology to shame,when scientists find new evidence and put it out for the world to see and review?Oh,that theists could be so ernest in their search for truth
- 1 decade ago
Taken DIRECTLY FROM THE ARTICLE:
"Susan Anton, a New York University anthropologist and co-author of the Leakey work, said she expects anti-evolution proponents to seize on the new research, but said it would be a mistake to try to use the new work to show flaws in evolution theory."
"This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points," Anton said. "This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continous self-testing process."
Looks like she was right about the anti-evolution proponents.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
"This is not questioning the idea at all of evolution; it is refining some of the specific points," Anton said. "This is a great example of what science does and religion doesn't do. It's a continuous self-testing process."
and to answer your question: Not God.
- ZombieTrix 2012Lv 61 decade ago
Evolution has not been proven false. What has happened is that our understanding of how it works has changed.
*sigh*
*drink*
- HerodotusLv 71 decade ago
Changing ones understanding with new evidence is called learning. Give it a try.
- larissaLv 61 decade ago
nothing can convince me that the eart was created in another way but by natural explanable events. im not saying god had nothing to do with it, but definately not in the way the creationist theory described it
- Anonymous1 decade ago
read the original article then come back.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Wow, the more we learn, the less we know.
I believe in the Biblical account of creation.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I'd still believe in nothing.