Who would you vote for if the two candidates ended up being Hillary or Giuliani?

Good question, you may well have predicted the final candidates over a year before the results the rest of us will not know for another year.

Hillary may not be the most honest person in the world, but I sense something very dark inside of Giuliani. I think he has "liar eyes".

I would still most likely find a third party candidate, because my state will vote Republican anyway. But, if these are the candidates, I will hope that Hillary wins. Giuliani will be just more bush. The USA need a good cleaning at the top, Hillary could be a good cleaning lady. Hillary is not Bill.

Throw the vote enough to let the House and the Senate vote for a President and V.P. -

How do you do this? Vote for a Green Party and Natural Law Candidate. Why? They can not win, no matter what, and it simply creates the best result, only if she were to be the person who prevailed in the primary at all.

I seriously believe that the House and the Senate want to elect someone other than Hillary anyway, Obama has always been the choice. Rudolph will not beat Romney - that's real, and unless Thompson gets in, who is likely to win the primary and give any Democrat a real ride, well, he really is the likely winner of the Republican ticket. (smile)

I know who you are. Get off the line, and stop perpetrating.

I would vote third party. (most likely Green Party)

I don't think Giuliani or H. Clinton could run this country.

Giuliani: he was just a mayor and since he has not been in national or even state politics he couldn't completly understand issues effecting this whole nation and he wouldn't know about foreign policy and other issues that don't apply to cities. Also, he is basically just using 9-11 to get elected-he brings it up all the time in the debates anyway he can. The fire fighter who wer at 9-11 don't support him in addition to his son and daughter. I also, don't understand why Republicans would want a liberal as their presidential candidate.

H. Clinton: I guess she would be the better of the two candidates but, I still don't like her. She is just using her husband to get elected-she mentions him many times in debates. I don't think that she could run this country either and she hasn't ever created any important bill in her 7 yr. in the senate. Also, she is known to have many socialist ideas.

Giuliani if I HAD to pick although I sure hope our choices are more qualified than those two. Hillary Clinton is a joke and Giuliani just isn't presidential material.

Giuliani

Giuliani

Giuliani

For years I've been watching as elections focus on California and NY and politicians think the rest of the country be damned. The opinion seems to be if you run a platform based on something has irrelevant as "New Yorkers and Californias rock" and suggest that you will propose bills saying they get free health care and no taxes--you will get elected as president.

It is my worst fear that they will end up running a NYer vs a NYer and then of course just pick someone random from Cali (whats Arnold doing these days) as VP. If it keeps on, I think the country is going to have a huge problem and soon discussion of rebellion or division. The e.c. system has got to be fixed BEFORE it gets to the point where they give us the worst candidates simply b/c of the states they represent.

Back when Bush was running against Kerry there was a huge 'Anybody but Bush' crowd. They've have voted for the village idiot so long as it wasn't Bush and Kerry fit that bill nicely.

Well, I'm of the Anybody but Hillary crowd. (I think we'll be surprised at how many of 'me' there are out there.) Her and her extreme socialist agenda scares the living crap out of people. She's not only a socialist, she's plain, flat out evil to boot.

Still, you make the choice easy. I kinda like Rudy.

Hillary Clinton.