Artificial Life? Would you trust the scientists who would make Artificial Life?

I take the view that what is referred to as "artificial life" is simply another step in the evolutionary process and therefore, by definition, is neither "artificial" nor inherently dangerous. That does not mean that the creation of new lifeforms or, in a more likely scenario, the modification of existing lifeforms, will not have serious repercussions to humankind.

I think it is niave of Mark Bedau to make the the second statement that you quoted. History is full of examples of the simplest life forms that have had profound effects on humans. Who can be so arrogant as to think that a new lifeform brewed in a research lab might not turn out to be the next black plague or HIV virus. Todays science fiction is often tomorrows reality.

I don't worry so much about what science creates as much as I think about what politicians and theologians might do with their creations. One thing I am certain of is that we humans are our own worst enemy.

Mark Bedau also states in the same article, "We're talking about a technology that could change our world in pretty fundamental ways - in fact, in ways that are impossible to predict." So first he says that it would be impossible to predict what they'd do, and then later states that they would not get out and "take over." Well, that sounds like a prediction to me.

The article also refers to this attempt to create artificial life as a "race." Hmmm, I hope those scientists involved in this race don't take any stupid chances in hopes of speeding things up (or maybe that's just something you see in movies). Also, their technique seems to be little more than forming a membrane and then dumping in a bunch of nucleotides and hoping for the best. If it does work, they have absolutely NO idea what they'll get. So we have scientists who are contradicting themselves, racing to the finish line, and in the end, they really don't know what they're making. These guys obviously aren't idiots, I just hope they're paying close enough attention when and if they succeed.

Would God truly be dead then? Would we then be god? Creating conscience, the ability to judge right from wrong and the ever inspiring thought, I am because I think I am is something that explodes with passion.

Would our time not be better suited to fully exploring our original mandate of making all of the earth like that of Eden instead of making a computer that thinks it deserves a coffee break, is a member of the local union and possibly one day writes the number 1 book on the New York Times Best selling list?

I wonder if such a creation would weaken us or make us stronger? I wonder if the power that is perceived by the creators from their creation would be satisfaction enough. Can we trust a scientist who would make artificial life? I am not sure of any real reason that I shouldn't trust such a person, but I can think of many ways in which I wouldn't trust the society that is birthed from such "creative" use of said scientist.

In creating artificial life there are so many factors to consider in order to make it perfect and to insure no after effects. I believe there is no one human being so perfect themselves as to be able to create any "artificial life" without a flaw. Scientisits can be highly intelligent but because of the possiblity of creating a miracle they seem to forget that if they were that perfect in their "ability" to create artificial life then they most likely would not be on this plane of life themselves. Unfortunately, Scientists are vulnerable to the deceptions of others. There will always be people out there that would try to force them to use that ability towards a cause that may not be good for mankind as a whole. With that said where would the Trust factor really be determined? With the Scientists or with Those entities that may be controlling him/her?

Science takes time because of experimentation. Some things work and other things don't work.

I'll trust the scientists who make Artificial Life. It will take years, perhaps decades, to perfect. Down the road, it can and may work. When it becomes successful, then I'll trust these scientists. At the current moment, I don't trust them.

Please remember, new seed varieties created to resist insecticides are are a form of artificial life. Never seen before and sometimes not reproducing on their own forcing farmers to buy new seeds each year. We start to form objections when the life can interact with us. Dolly the sheep rattled many and was hidden from the public for fear of reprisals. Now we are assured that Dolly was one of the few of 100 embryos that survived and that Dolly died early because there was an 'error" in the genetics that "designed" her. Yes we are uneasy about these people playing with DNA. We are also startying to see fragments of DNA theropy and other benefits from these people developing methods of helping people. The scientific community is merciless when they see other scientists abusing the DNA techniques. Memories of Nazis doing things to improve the 'race' are still fresh in everyones minds. Avoiding 'improvements' is very ingrained now. Discoveries like finding that people with sickle cell anemia actually are very resistant to malaryia has convinced scientists that they don't know everything and have to move very carefully to not upset natures solutions to natures problems. Please trust them.

Hi Richard,

Artifiicial life invented by scientist are already out in open globally but with a small ratio compared to the labotories.Its secretly been exposed amongst us as a test from these scientists.

Well time will explain who takes over whom,but the imagination is already out in open and show.

Trust is quite difficult to explain at this point as there are both pros and cons to its effect.

Our physical bodies are the creation of our mind. Are we artificial? Any physical "matter" is artificial, an illusion. Life exists without being "physical".

We are creators, we create. How arrogant and predictable that the ego would think anyone else "creating life" is an artificial endeavor.

Ideas are given birth and die every day for lack of nourishment.

Life's only longing is for itself and it isn't a physical thing.

Not anytime soon, certainly. I think it is likely that a small critter like a virus or a germ would come first, and that it would be way too easy for it to get into the environment. I've even heard it suggested that the AIDS virus is an artificial one.

maximum scientists make funds from government provides. you don't get a grant except you could convince some retard flesh presser there's a difficulty that throughout basic terms they are able to looking a answer to......in simple terms provide them a grant. as long as we save offering grant funds there'll constantly be some goofy existence threatening problem that needs to have a scientific answer.......have you ever heard of those initiatives? * $80,000 learn on why the comparable communities constantly dominate March insanity; * $315,000 learn suggesting enjoying FarmVille on facebook enables adults develop and preserve relationships; * $a million million for an diagnosis of ways immediately father and mom respond to fashionable toddler names; * $50,000 to produce and publicize beginner songs approximately technological expertise, alongside with a rap called “funds 4 Drugz,” and a deceptive music titled “Biogas is a gas, gas, gas”; * $2 million to confirm that persons who regularly placed up photos on the cyber web from the comparable region on the comparable time are many times buddies * $581,000 on whether on line relationship internet site shoppers are racist. This comes from a catalogue of 1000's of provides over the previous couple of years we are dropping funds on.. We have been instructed Vice-President Biden became going to be monitoring this to make valuable our funds became spent properly. Or is that this what Obama is conversing approximately while he needs funds for greater jobs?