Should non-Muslim cultures adopt Islamic norms and strip femininity out of society? Separating genders good?

I tell ya this:

This is one fatwa I can get behind, we need to adopt this over here:

he Cleric Ezzat Attiya issued a fatwa whereby otherwise unrelated men and women could work alone together only if the man were to be breast-fed by his female counterpart first. He reasoned that doing this would establish a mother-son bond, cleverly side-stepping typical rules concerning co-ed socializing.

Ezzat Attiya for President!!

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JP...

edit:

Muhammad Ishfaq A,

What kind of adult fears imaginary characters? I got no hate for ya bro...just pity. You live in fear of nonsense, that is so sad. So pathetic.

I really do hope one day you break your chains of mental slavery, man.

Honestly, I wish you the best.

Hay Faruk,

We live in a secular society, We could care less abbout the position of Christianity and Judaism regrading homosexuality. Just like we could care less about the muslim one

I don't think it would make any difference whatsoever. In fact, the best solution is to encourage sexual freedom in islamic societies so they become less violent. It could be effective if sustained over 2 or 3 generations

Compare the number of gang rapes in islamic countries compared with liberal, secular ones for example.

Plus I am not willing to donate a penny so that muslims will 'like us more' (this is never going to happen!) and the idea of segregating myself from men for the sake of islam is unthinkable!

"Furthermore, Muslims might not hate us as much. Maybe on a 1-10 scale, they it would drop from a 10 to a 9.9."

ask urself who is it that holds hatred the most inside...

"If non-muslim cultures separated woman from men, as in Islamic countries and cultures, would Muslims hate us less. Would we be safer?"

eh? what do you mean by would we be safer? its not like ur under any threat? you people are the one with the overwhelming military dominance. you people are the ones on a conquering spree. Quit fear mongering you bigot.

Not at all.

I feel the best option is to follow a middle path. Not the greek path and not the muslim path. Something in between.

truthfully that's not. There are 2 thoroughly diverse interpretations of that verse. yet another interpretation thoroughly leaves off the area approximately beating them. The worst area of this question is you're utilising extremists as an occasion. you rather might desire to instruct your self. So i will do it for you: the 1st translation is the only you have and the 2d is: "men are the help of ladies as God provides some greater ability than others, and because they spend of their wealth (to offer for them)... As for ladies you experience are averse, consult from them suasively; then leave them on my own in mattress (without molesting them) and pass to mattress with them (whilst they're keen)" the difficulty is translating the interest qawwamuna 'ala an-nisa that would mean, look after, help or attend to. the main suitable observe interior the verse, adribuhunna (sp?) can the two mean beat them or pass alongside with them. back, that's attempting to locate an English translation to the various words in Arabic. If the Bible translations rather are maximum appropriate, why are there such diverse diverse variations of them? earlier the religion of Islam entered into the Arab international, ladies have been seen as chattels and can desire to no longer very own sources. in case you talk the Christian subculture (this is likewise my faith), they have executed a similar element. ladies had to stay at living house and characteristic a tendency to the living house and young infants mutually as the guy went to paintings. the assumption of ladies being lined up, (a million) became to emulate the way the better halves of Muhammad because of the fact they have been seen "the mothers of the Ummah". They weren't in any respect compelled to positioned on them, they have been in basic terms accompanied over a volume of time after Muhammad's demise. (2) His better halves have been veiled for a feeling of modesty. they had to have their outfits around them somewhat to be referred to as believers and so no harm will come to them (33:60). in spite of each and everything, they have been married to a prophet. the difficulty lies interior the difficulty of examining center eastern languages to English. There are words in Arabic that would mean delight in, yet whilst translated English mean have intercourse with. something violent isn't interior the call of Allah. this is why they do no longer know "holy conflict" as area of their faith. i'm no longer Muslim. yet I do learn the subculture to assist maximum appropriate people who make assumptions which incorporate this one.

Dude, women are awesome, why would we want to cover them up and force them to hide their personalities?

And taking a gigantic step backwards to make another culture happy is beyond absurd!

What would be the position of Christianity and Judaism regrading homosexuality?

Yes.

I'm starting a rock pile now to get ready for those loose women who show their noses.

You must fear the fury of God, instead of hatred of Muslims.