Do You Think That N Pelosi & Hillary Call on G.W. Bush Not Attend The Opening of Beijing Olympics is Mean?

It's a political gimmick. It's not mean.

How many voters could possibly be offended by her taking a position like that on Tibet? On the other hand, how many voters are likely to approve of the position?

How many people that see it as a cheap political ploy are people that would have voted for her anyway? How many who see it as an important political statement like Bush in the first place, and are happy she's trying to tell him what to do?

Is there anyone so feeble minded as to think that she gives a rip about Tibet? Then again, maybe she might. Didn't the guy she was named after climb a mountain there five years after she was born?

They are stupid.

China has been slowly changing simply because we've been engaging them,peacefully,for 40 years.

The Chinese people are gaining a voice in their own future and the days of Totalitarian Government are numbered.

While the Chinese are coming to the side of limited government,Nancy and Hillary are trying to give us more government control over our lives.

Liberal Democrats in our congress and senate will always oppose President Bush!

It doesn't matter what President Bush does they will always say it is not right, not enough or find some way to criticize him! This is their pattern - never agree with President Bush - destroy him anyway possible!

For Liberal Democrats regaining the White House and their Liberal Power base is the only goal - screw the U.S.!

What could it benefit? We did no longer help the Moscow olympics interior the 80s with the aid of fact we've been interior the middle of the chilly conflict. we are actually not in a good remotely comparable concern with China. in certainty, China is a key financial paying for and merchandising better half to the US. What can we ought to benefit? do no longer think of for one 2nd that this "suggestion" by potential of Pelosi (rat) is something different than political. She needs to discover one greater thank you to attempt to poke Bush interior the attention, like there are not greater suitable subject concerns that desire interest precise now. What has China performed that we ought to constantly boycott? Environmental subject concerns? Human rights? What will we carry them in charge for that we don't additionally proportion some blame? this could do little greater suitable than punish the athletes who spend their lives training for those activities. could Pelosi additionally like us to end paying for with the aid of fact they are harvested in international locations like Panama, with questionable human rights histories and labor regulation subject concerns? could she like us to end utilising our computers with the aid of plastic that makes up the final public of the gadget? She needs to bear in suggestions that, regardless of all her marketing campaign supplies you in California, she remains in charge to end something. The Deomocrat Congress has been a bust. they have performed little greater suitable than attempt to poke Bush interior the attention for any and each determination he makes and blame him for a conflict that Clinton would have prevented. Pelosi is a boob, and he or she's merely searching for some interest to divert the yank public far flung from watching what's surely occurring (or no longer occurring, with the aid of fact the case would be) in Washington.

It is unfair to the athletes of this country who have trained for this event to be forced to boycott for political reasons.

Carter made many mistakes. His boycott was one of the biggest.

According to Obama we should stretch out our welcoming arms to every evil dictator and tyrant. He's just being concise.

Well, I don't see why bother not going to the Opening Ceremony if you are still going to compete.

If they really cared about China's Human Right record, why don't they fight them like they did Iraq? Answer: Becuase they are not almost completely helpless.

No, I think they are expressing their opinion. If anything, Bush is the hypocrite because he claims to be in favor of freeing oppressed people such as the monks in Burma -- so it is inconsistent for him to ignore the monks in Tibet.

prob not.