Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why didn't Hillary return fire on those Kosovo snipers?

She must have been packing heat right?

It's fun to watch the amorphous mass that is Hillary Clinton take on a new form every day. I can't wait to see who she'll be or what she'll stand for next week!

Update:

JustGood: Yeah, okay, you got me there. I got confused. Kosovo is where she singlehandedly brokered the peace deal, right?

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    She did, the Hero of Kosovo was reportedly carrying a M240e. She had her machine gun so hot you could fry an egg on it according to Bill Clinton is a recent stump speech in Indiana. He further revealed why the "truth" has failed to be presented in the mainstream press, saying, " the media just loves Obama, they didn't report he peed his pants prior to the debates, and they edited all the pictures from Kosovo, showing Hillary holding and grouping her shots like a veteran. Many of the Marines came up to her asking her for independent instructions prior to her entering the tarmac to receive her hero's welcome for making the place safe for all combatants and non combatants alike."

  • 1 decade ago

    Probably because she misspoke about Bosnia, not Kosovo. She never claimed there were snipers in Kosovo or that she was there. Bosnia and Kosovo aren't the same country by far.

    EDIT That was Ireland, it's OK just amazing to see no one thought of that before. I don't see the importance of this issue when America is in a war and neither of the corporate parties including Hillary or Obama is willing to stop the bloodshed.

    The evolution of the 2008 election campaign has already made it clear that the American people will once again be denied the right to decide at the polls whether Washington should continue its criminal war against the Iraqi people. The Democratic Party, following a now well-worn path, is once again preparing to politically disenfranchise the substantial antiwar majority of the American electorate.

    In the 2002 midterm elections, the Democratic leadership in Congress took a deliberate decision to deliver the votes needed to authorize the invasion of Iraq, reasoning that it would thus take the question of war “off the table” and enable it to wage a successful campaign based on economic issues. The result was a severe defeat that delivered both houses of Congress to the Republicans.

    In 2004, the party leadership steered the nomination to two US senators—John Kerry and John Edwards—who had voted for the war in 2002 and who made it clear they had no intention of withdrawing American forces. Indeed, Kerry suggested that, if elected, he would launch his own “surge.”

    In 2006, the Democrats won back control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate in a vote that clearly represented a popular repudiation of the war. Having gained control of Congress, the Democrats proceeded to do nothing but provide funding for the war to continue.

    Now, the two remaining candidates for the Democratic nomination are locked in a national security campaign aimed at proving themselves best qualified to serve as commander-in-chief. Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have advanced platforms that provide for the continued presence of the US military in Iraq for purposes of counter-terrorism operations, the protection of US facilities and interests, and the training of Iraqi puppet forces—meaning that tens of thousands of troops would remain in the country indefinitely. Obama’s former senior foreign policy advisor spelled out in a recent interview with the BBC that no one should take his promises regarding troop withdrawal too seriously, as they would be scrapped the moment he entered the White House and began consultation with the military brass.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    surely, she took conceal at the back of a motor vehicle, took out her own pistol from the holster she constantly has strapped to her leg, and back hearth, killing approximately 15 militants. She then informed them that they were 'peregrutzka-ed", and if the punks wanted to debris together with her or her u . s . a . lower back, that they had ought to pass to the Kosovo lodge at 3AM that night. do no longer mess with Hillary while she's been eating. Peace

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    She did not return fire because nobody shot her. She continues to embarrass herself and yet there are those Americans who would support her even though she does things that make herself look bad and still people vote for her.

    As a woman, Hillary is simply not qualified to be a political or military leader. Joan of Arc was defeated because she was a woman, even her faith could not help her.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • bwlobo
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Here's a good Hillary joke that fits your question...

    A politician was running for re-election and was talking at a campaign stop to his constituents.

    "My opponent has called me a liar. Rest assured, I have never lied to you. The only problem I have is that the facts don't always match up with what I believe."

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    "She must have been packing heat right?" well, in fact, no.

    The secret service stipulated to Bill that she had to give up all weapons after the Vince Foster thing. Otherwise they were going to tell all. It was just too risky looking after her otherwise.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yeah I heard her today talking about the Second Amendment like she is in favor of it. LOL What a crock.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    She left the piece she was packing in her luggage, which by the way she had her secret service carrying for her.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Next thing she'll say is that she was there on D-day...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They weren't Snipers, they were mortars that shot out bears that had chainsaws instead of arms and legs, get your facts right.

    /sarcasm.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.