Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If Bill and Hillery really care Y not spread the 11 + million she spent on her campaign?

Would it have been better to give it to the poor.How many familys or single Mom's would be better off with some of that money Jest 1,000.oo per house will go a long way.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes, it would have been better to give it to the needy people. I agree with you. Instead, she is a selfish jack- a s s who only thinks about herself...and people want her as President.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yeah, and why dosent Bush just hand out all the money he made on his oil war he created, him and cheney sure made quite a profit out of all of us. But Im sure you already knew that. Obama and Mccain should do the same thing as well, and mine as well throw in Kerry and Gore from the previous elections. The hell does it matter how much they spend, its there money. Are you handing out all your spare change even if its a few cents everytime you have the opportunity? didnt think so

  • 1 decade ago

    I understand that John Kerry (he was in Vietnam, don't you know) spent $1 BILLION dollars on his 2004 election campaign. He definitely would have been better off to just buy the American electorate.

  • 1 decade ago

    just giving money directly to poor people is not going to have any useful long-term effect.

    how do you choose which 11,000 houses to give the money to?

    what happens when that £1000 is used up?

    how do you know they'll use it sensibly?

    we need long-term solutions to poverty, not just hand-outs.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.