Would 1-year suspensions help curb the NCAA violations?

I was listening to Mike and Mike this morning and they brought up great points...

1) Why don't agents and Boosters get punished?

2) what real punishment does the athlete get?

3) Why punish only the school?

I don't see how a professional league would go along with suspending a player for a year, because players become a product once they turn pro, with hopes that they will benifit whatever team they go to, players careers are short already, there is noway the NFl or the NBA would sit by and watch a player just sit around for a year.

Would never happen, unfortunately. The pro leagues and NCAA have very little cooperation. And There is NO way the Saints, Player's Union, Bush's endorsers, or the NFL would want to suspend Reggie for a NCAA problem.

And you blame the children for being children? Well, I blame the vultures preying on those despite the fact and making use of them to get wealthy. I'm now not speaking approximately the tuition's however the booster's, sellers, and mooching loved ones individuals. So no, I do not consider it might be proper and that i additionally do not consider it might diminish whatever.

This would have to be the way to stop it, because nothing happens to the athletes at all. You would have to go after them and the agents.

Right now, only the schools get hurt.

Yes, and the whole USC sports program should get a two-year death penalty!

1.Wouldn't work! 2.Not excessive enough. 3. Kicked off team would be best.