Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Dr Jello asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 1 decade ago

Is Nuclear Power and Genetically Modified Foods the Solution to So-Called "Global Warming"?

Development of Nuclear Power will allow the generation of thousands of Mega-Watts of power without producing any green house gases.

Genetically Modified foods will allow crops to grow faster with less water, produce more sugar, grow denser, faster, and produce higher yields.

Should we recognize these scientific marvels and embrace the modern technology for the gain and benefit of man, or would it be better to keep to older technologies and give up the benefits that science has given us?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    It is one of the solutions, so when is the U.S. going to get going on this?

  • Ken
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Significantly increasing our reliance on Nuclear Power is a no brainier. While the fear and concerns about this technology were reasonable in the 60's and 70's, after 40 years of a proven safety record (both Coal and hydro-power have caused far more deaths than nuclear power) it's time people let go of those bogeymen.

    And new technologies are on the verge of being able to recycle spent fuel (generating more energy from it) eliminating the concern over disposal.

    Additional electricity capacity is needed to energize the soon to be booming market of electric and pluggable hybrid cars (as gas prices push higher and higher).

    Source(s): Safety of Nuclear Reactors: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf06.html
  • Steve
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Nuclear power should diffentatly be a part. They should be combined with hydraulic peaker plants. We just had one overflow about a year ago here. But one done side of nuclear (and coal also) once they are online the produce excess energy at night.

    One comment,

    I thought the plutonium used for nuclear power could not be used for weapons grade plutonium?

  • 1 decade ago

    Unless we use breeder reactors, which we've been opposed to because of the possibility of nuclear arms proliferation that might result, then nuclear power would not be a solution to global warming, because there is not enough fuel to serve our energy demands for the 21st century. Fusion power would, but of course it's been the energy of the future for 50 years. Genetically modified foods could help in a very minor way.

    The question of global warming may end up being moot, though, because fossil fuels may not last long enough to even drive us into the lowest of the IPCC scenarios. And yes, I am including coal--it is likely that world coal reserves are vastly inflated. Of course, if we don't have fossil fuels or nuclear energy, and an increasing demand for energy in general, that is a huge problem in and of itself.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    The answer to global warming (or if you don't believe in that, any environmental/social issue) is decentralization of resources, production, and power. Nuclear power and genetically modified crops take some of the most basic things we need to survive and maintain a quality of life and centralize them in the hands of a very small number of people.

    This seems like something that leftist environmentalists and small government conservatives could all get behind. And yet we fight over semantics.

  • 1 decade ago

    Both of them are the way to go.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.